LA SEPTUAGINTA O BIBLIA DE LOS SETENTA
Por: J.N.Robles Olarte
Así es como se le conoce ¡ Es la Versión Griega de las Sagradas Escrituras Hebreas, la única que ha tenido el honor y distinción de haber sido el primer libro importante de permanecer en toda buena Biblioteca que se considere como tal, misma que ha sido traducida a muchos otros idiomas del mundo entero¡
Se dice que en un antiguo documento conocido como la Carta de Aristea se revela el plan de hacerla la traducción oficial de la Biblia Hebrea original ¡ Ésta traducción habría de ser la Biblia Oficial de los Judíos y reemplazar la Biblia hebrea original.
Supuestamente 72 eruditos Judíos efectuaron tal traducción, seis por cada una de las tribus originales; pero en verdad fueron en total trece las Tribus ya que de José, uno de los menores hijos de Jacob, procedieron dos hijos, Manasés y Efraim que reemplazaron a su padre.
La supuesta ubicación donde se llevó a efecto tal trabajo es en Alejandría, Egipto, y una pretendida fecha del mismo es la del año 250 A:E:C (Antes de la Era Común) y precisamente durante los 400 años de silencio transcurridos entre el cierre de la escritura del Antiguo Testamento –por allá en el 397 AEC- y el comienzo de la elaboración de lo que se conoce, hoy día, como el Nuevo Testamento.
Lo curioso de todo ello es que la tal Carta de Aristea no ha sido considerada por ningún erudito moderno como un documento real y que haya existido alguien con ese nombre de Aristea. Más bien se le otorga la autoría a otro autor pagano muy conocido, Philo.
Además observe que, realmente, se debería llamar La Biblia de los 72, o con más certeza La Bibliade los 78 ya que fueron trece las Tribus pero no, se le conoce solo como la Biblia de los 70 por una razón muy sencilla: la fuerza que ha ejercido la numerología entre Judíos y Cristianos desde tiempos inmemoriales, algo que en verdad nada tiene que ver con las cosas de nuestro Creador y Padre, YHWH.
La tan nombrada Carta de Aristea es la única “evidencia” de la existencia de tan místico documento, si es que así se le puede llamar. Absolutamente no existe ningún Antiguo Testamento Griego con fecha de, o cercana, al 250 AEC. Tampoco existe ningún registro dentro de la Historia Judía en el que se haya efectuado o contemplado tal obra. Sencillamente fue impuesta como tal para beneficio de los interesados en esconder verdades al género humano. Más aún, cuando se presiona a ciertos eruditos a que presenten evidencias de la legitimidad de tal obra recurren y señalan una obra obra de Orígenes, EXAPLA,. Escrita por allá en el 200 EC (Era Común moderna), es decir aproximadamente unos 450 años después que fue escrita la Septuaginta, y más de 100 años después que fue concluido el Nuevo Testamento.
La segunda columna de la Exapla de Orígenes, cristiano de la Iglesia Griega, contiene su propia traducción personal griega del Antiguo Testamento que incluye, entre otras cosas, libros espurios tales como “Bel y el Dragón”, “Judith” ,“Tobías” y otros más, aceptados sólo por la Iglesia Católica Romana.
Los que proponen al mundo la invisible Septuaginta tratan de aducir que Orígenes no tradujo, del Hebreo al Griego, tal obra sino que sólo copió de la Versión de los 70 la segunda columna de su obra Exapla; pero ello no es cierto dado que implicaría que los astutos 72 eruditos Judíos habrían de agregar los libros apócrifos a su obra antes de que lo hubiesen escrito o, por otra parte, Orígenes se tomó la libertad de añadir éstas escrituras espurias a las Escrituras Hebreas, cosa que está absolutamente prohibido en Deuteronomio 4:2, Deuteronomio 12:31 y Proverbios 30:6.
Vemos así cómo la segunda columna de la Exapla sólo es la propia traducción de Orígenes basada en el Antiguo Testamento Griego ya antes elaborado…y nada más.
Tanto Eusebio como Philo, escritores paganos de dudoso carácter y confiabilidad, también hacen mención del Pentateuco Griego, es decir, los primeros cinco libros del Antiguo Testamento que, en verdad, no son todo el Antiguo Testamento. Tampoco se menciona que tal Pentateuco haya sido una traducción oficialmente aceptada.
Recordemos que para el 150 AEC se escribió un pequeño papiro que se conoce con el nombre de Papiro Ryland, Nº 458. Sólo contiene los capítulos 23 al 28 del libro de Deuteronomio. Ni más ni menos. Se puede deducir de lo anterior que, en realidad, el mismo fue el que llevó tanto a Eusebio como a Philo asumir que todo el Pentateuco había sido traducido por algún “escriba” en un esfuerzo de poder interesar a los gentiles sobre la historia de los Judios.
Ciertamente que lo anterior puede ser y es una porción de la pretendida idea de que hubo una “traducción oficial” al griego del Antiguo Testamento. Podemos estar seguros que aquellos “72 eruditos Judíos”, supuestamente escogidos para traducir las Escrituras Hebreas, en el año 250 AEC, es sólo una excusa sin fundamento alguno, algo insignificante, ante la realidad habida en aquellos años 150 EAC. Más aún, si hubo en realidad uno de nombre Aristea, tuvo que vérselas con dos grandes problemas, i) identificar y localizar las 13 tribus con el sólo propósito de escoger 6 de cada una de ellas, ii) si identificó a cada una de las trece Tribus no hubiese traducido las Escrituras Hebreas por dos razones muy simples, a) el cuidado y preservación de las escrituras le fue dada por el Creador mismo a la Tribu de Leví, como bien se puede evidenciar en Deuteronomio 17:18, Deuteronomio 31:25-26 y Malaquías 2:7. Y con ello en mente podemos estar bien seguros que ninguno de las otras Tribus se habrían atrevido a efectuar tal traducción y b) es obvio para todo buen lector de las Sagradas Escrituras que los Israelitas fueron muy diferentes a todas aquellas naciones que habitaban a su alrededor, pues guardaban el Sábado, la Circuncisión, las Leyes de Higiene, las Leyes sobre las carnes aptas para el consumo humano, además de heredar el lenguaje Hebreo. Con respecto a esto último vemos cómo los Judíos practicantes Chinos e Indúes se rehúsan a enseñar a sus hijos otro idioma que no sea el Hebreo, como también los Judíos Fashala de Etiopía mantuvieron y mantienen ,celosamente, su lenguaje Hebreo.
No olvidemos que las muchas citas que encontramos en el Nuevo Testamento no son otra cosa que aquellas citas que encontramos en la segunda columna del Exapla de Orígenes. Son, en realidad, citas de su verdadera autora, La Reina de los Cielos, quien se ha tomado la libertad de citar la Obra Magna del Soberano Único, YHWH, consignadas por Él en Sus Sagradas Escrituras o Antiguo Testamento.
El por qué muchos eruditos Judíos y Cristianos han aceptado la existencia de la Septuaginta es muy sencilla, simple, pero muy triste. El Hebreo antiguo es un lenguaje extremadamente difícil para poderlo aprender y comprender. Toma años el poder adquirir un conocimiento cabal del mismo y llegar a obtener una fluidez suficiente como para poderlo usar como un medio de estudio. No así sucede con el Griego que es más fácil de aprender, hablar y leer y cuyos cambios gramaticales y escritura no han cambiado gran cosa. Desafortunadamente la existencia de la Septuaginta, matriz de las demás Biblias que vemos en el mundo, se basó sólo en dos hechos primordiales, el orgullo y la voracidad.
Resumamos: 1) La traducción conocida como Septuaginta se elaboró entre los siglos tercero y segundo AEC, y durante ese período de tiempo toda la Biblia Hebrea fue traducida al Griego. 2) Durante el reinado de Ptolomeo Philadelphus (285-246 AEC) fue cuando el Pentateuco se tradujo al Griego. 3) Aquello de los 70 es sólo una referencia lúdica de poder encontrar justificación para engañar a los tontos y crédulos; y de ello nos habla Éxodo 24:1 y 9. 4) La Septuaginta fue, es y ha sido un factor definitivo para la “preparación” de la creación e instauración del Cristianismo, como también las “revelaciones” adjuntas en el Nuevo Testamento. 5) Los traductores hicieron gala de medios nada ortodoxos ni transparentes como tampoco correctos ya que se basaron en lo ellos llaman “principios exegéticos” que no son otra cosa que un “análisis crítico o interpretación de una palabra o de un pasaje literario” de las Escrituras Hebreas originales y 6) Las Sagradas Escrituras del Altísimo no necesitan de análisis crítico ni de interpretación alguna puesto que Él, allí, nos dice lo que en verdad nos quiere decir, con palabras simples, sencillas, transparentes, que hasta un niño puede entender y para que las podamos poner en práctica para lograr tener una vida llena de satisfacciones y felicidad como Él bien lo ha querido desde que creó al género humano.
Fuentes de Información:
1) The Hope of Israel, Volumen 11 # 3
2) Unger´s Bible Dictionary, Tema: Septuaginta
3) Exapla por Orígenes→ www.bible.gen.nz/amos/people/hexapla.htm
4) The Letter of Aristea → www.invaluable.com/auctio.lat/judaica:-aristeas-aristea-de-settenta-doc-3-c-cbgrxhbca
5) Ryland´s Papyrus→ www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_09.asp
jueves, 12 de marzo de 2009
viernes, 23 de enero de 2009
PALABRAS DEL SALMO 103 QUE DEBERÍAMOS RECORDAR SIEMPRE.
-De David: Bendice oh alma mía al Eterno Creador, y todas mis entrañas bendigan Su santo Nombre.
Bendice. Oh alma mía al Eterno Creador y no te olvides de todos Sus beneficios.
Él es quien perdona todas tus iniquidades y sana todas tus enfermedades y quien rescata tu vida de la sepultura; que te rodea de misericordia y compasiones; que harta de bien tu juventud: así se renovará, como plumaje de águila tu puericia.
Justicia ejecuta el Creador Eterno, y juicios, para todos los oprimidos.
Hizo conocer Sus caminos a Moisés, Sus hazañas a los hijos de Israel.
Compasivo y benigno es el Creador; lento en iras, y grande en en misericordia.
No contenderá para siempre, ni para siempre guardará la ira, pues no ha hecho con nosotros conforme a nuestros pecados, ni nos ha recompensando conforme a nuestras iniquidades; porque así como el cielo es alto sobre la tierra, así tan grande es Su misericordia a los que Le temen: Cuanto dista el oriente del occidente, tanto hay alejado de nosotros nuestras rebeliones.
Como un padre se compadece de sus hijos, así el Eterno Creador se compadece de todos aquéllos que Le temen;- porque Él conoce nuestra hechura, tiene presente que somos polvo.
En cuanto al hombre, como la hierba son sus días; como la flor del campo, así florece; porque un soplo pasa por él, y ya no existe, y no le conocerá más su lugar.
Empero la misericordia del Eterno Creador es desde la eternidad y hasta la eternidad sobre todos aquéllos que Le temen; y Su justicia alcanza los hijos de los hijos, para todos aquellos que guardan S
u Pacto, y los que se acuerdan de Sus Mandamientos para ponerlos por obra.
El Eterno Creador ha establecido Su trono en los cielos, y Su Rei9no domina sobre todos.
Bendecid al Eterno Creador, vosotros Sus ángeles, poderosos en fuerza. Que ejecutáis Sus mandatos, escuchando la voz de Su palabra.
¡Bendecid al Eterno Creador, todas Sus obras en todos los lugares de Su Señorío, bendecid, oh alma mía, al Eterno Creador de los universos!
-De David: Bendice oh alma mía al Eterno Creador, y todas mis entrañas bendigan Su santo Nombre.
Bendice. Oh alma mía al Eterno Creador y no te olvides de todos Sus beneficios.
Él es quien perdona todas tus iniquidades y sana todas tus enfermedades y quien rescata tu vida de la sepultura; que te rodea de misericordia y compasiones; que harta de bien tu juventud: así se renovará, como plumaje de águila tu puericia.
Justicia ejecuta el Creador Eterno, y juicios, para todos los oprimidos.
Hizo conocer Sus caminos a Moisés, Sus hazañas a los hijos de Israel.
Compasivo y benigno es el Creador; lento en iras, y grande en en misericordia.
No contenderá para siempre, ni para siempre guardará la ira, pues no ha hecho con nosotros conforme a nuestros pecados, ni nos ha recompensando conforme a nuestras iniquidades; porque así como el cielo es alto sobre la tierra, así tan grande es Su misericordia a los que Le temen: Cuanto dista el oriente del occidente, tanto hay alejado de nosotros nuestras rebeliones.
Como un padre se compadece de sus hijos, así el Eterno Creador se compadece de todos aquéllos que Le temen;- porque Él conoce nuestra hechura, tiene presente que somos polvo.
En cuanto al hombre, como la hierba son sus días; como la flor del campo, así florece; porque un soplo pasa por él, y ya no existe, y no le conocerá más su lugar.
Empero la misericordia del Eterno Creador es desde la eternidad y hasta la eternidad sobre todos aquéllos que Le temen; y Su justicia alcanza los hijos de los hijos, para todos aquellos que guardan S
u Pacto, y los que se acuerdan de Sus Mandamientos para ponerlos por obra.
El Eterno Creador ha establecido Su trono en los cielos, y Su Rei9no domina sobre todos.
Bendecid al Eterno Creador, vosotros Sus ángeles, poderosos en fuerza. Que ejecutáis Sus mandatos, escuchando la voz de Su palabra.
¡Bendecid al Eterno Creador, todas Sus obras en todos los lugares de Su Señorío, bendecid, oh alma mía, al Eterno Creador de los universos!
lunes, 19 de enero de 2009
THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF ISRAELITE AMERICA
by Walter Baucum
Did the history of our great nation start only 500 years ago with Columbus' "discovery" of America? Or have our people been around for thousands of years, sailing the crosswinds and ocean currents to the "Land Beyond the Sunset"? This book lays bare the truth of our Israelite ancestors, from Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham, all the way back to Shem and the great Sumerian civilization, and forward to the great empires of Phoenicia, Libya, Carthage, Celtica, the British Commonwealth countries, and the United States. Even the Macedonian-Greek Empire of Alexander the Great very likely was an Israelite empire. We will find that America was just an outpost of all these great empires, that trade, exploitation, and settlement of our country from the Middle East, North Africa, Europe, and Scandinavia have been ongoing for at least 3,000 years and possibly longer.
We are citizens of the most sophisticated nation on earth, yet the most ignorant of our past, continuing to believe, and to teach our schoolchildren, that this land was settled by Asians crossing the Bering land bridge after the last ice age. In this book, we will show evidence that our people were here first, that we are one of the so-called "Lost Tribes" of Israel, that Israelites were great empire builders, that English can be traced to Hebrew and therefore might be the oldest language on earth, that the Vatican knew about America 300 years before Columbus, that the cataclysmic ending of the Bronze Age was brought about by Joshua and the armies of Israel, and much more.
Historians and archaeologists have failed or refused to recognize these truths for centuries, and even our own government has bought into the farce that Asians are the "native" Americans. This book not only will show the farce of these claims, but also will give us a deeper appreciation of our roots, as well as insight into our future.
This book dares to disclaim the myth that Columbus was the first European to reach America. The author lays bare the truth of America's Israelite ancestors, from old Father Abraham, all the way back to Noah's son Shem and the great Sumerian civilization, and forward to the empires of Phoenicia, Libya, Carthage, Celtica, the British Commonwealth countries, and the United States. With "proof upon proof," he clearly shows how this continent was not "found" by a few lost and shipwrecked seamen sailing the crosswinds and ocean currents of the worlds, but that this "Land Beyond the Sunset" was a deliberate outpost of all these great empires, with trade, exploitation, and settlement of our country from the Middle East, North Africa, Europe, and Scandinavia being a ubiquitous and ongoing fact of history for at least 3,000 years, or even longer.
We Americans are citizens of the most sophisticated nation on earth, yet the most ignorant of our past, continuing to believe, and to teach our schoolchildren, that this land was settled by Asians crossing the Bering land bridge after the last ice age. In vivid, easy-to-read, well-documented detail, the writer shows that our people were here first, that we are one of the so-called "Lost Tribes" of Israel, that Israelites were great empire builders, that English can be traced to Hebrew and is possibly the oldest language on earth, that the Vatican knew about America 300 years before Columbus, that the cataclysmic ending of the Bronze Age was the result of Joshua and the armies of Israel, and much more.
He boldly accuses America's historians and archaeologists of mysteriously failing or deliberately refusing to teach these truths for centuries and points out how even our own government has bought into the farce that Asians are the "native" Americans. The author not only points out the truth of these claims, but also gives our American people a deeper appreciation of their roots, as well as insight into their future.
Why is my book different from other books on the market?
The history of America's brilliant past has been recorded in parts and pieces by both ancient and modern historians, but because of our collective blindness to our true national identity, no one has put all of it together in one book until now. Historians, anthropologists, and other researchers seeking the truth of our past make startling, even daring, discoveries almost daily, but all seem to bog down in bias or misinterpretation before their final conclusions. This book is different because the author draws upon, and credits, their research but goes that final step further by saying what none of them dare say about our Israelite past. Once we see who we really are, the prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures present us with an even more brilliant future.
Who is your target audience?
Historians, religionists, American school children, anyone who loves, or has searched for, both the history and the truth of our national identity, and also anyone who wonders where The United States of America is going in its future.
THE TRACING OF DAN
________________________________________
MESOLITTIC AND NEOLITTIC EUROPE
According to various sources the Dan-ish kingdom is Europe`s oldest. If Professor John Hawks is rigth - modern man wandered into Europe from the north. Then we will have a perfectly clear clue to the origin of the European (agri-) culture - being the first Danes.
This is also agreed by the saga-material, which says that "Dans line spread from Jul-land, cultivating the western part of Northern Europe".
Today we seem to call them either "German" or "Celts" - since Caesar named them all after the south-western region of Gallia. The close paralells between archeoligical items from Germans, Celts, Langobards and others have proven that this "Celtic cultures" have spread from Biscaya to western shores of The Black Sea.
From here you may follow the river-system northwards - to the river Wizla, that still run out by DAN-ZIG.
The artefacts from mesolitticum, neolitticum and broze age have proven that the Wizla river have been the MAIN border (and the only clear one) throughout ancient Europe. Even England is part of that culture.
CHARACTERISTICS
The characteristics of the ceramics, tools and architecture west of Wizla is coherent - way to the Atlantic. From Julland to Moldau, from Malmo to Marseilles. Thus it is known that they traded and mixed with the Thrakian/Makedonian in the south - and the Fenno-Ugrians (Schytians/Russians) in the east.
At this time the collective name for the nort-west was not "Europeans". But rather Danaoi.
"Dan-ae" actually says "Danish" - probably as feminium. "Dan-a-ya" and "Tanaja" sounds as "The Danes" - or "The land of the Danes". The Irish referred to the first agriculturalist as Tuatha de Danaan.
Still today we find "Ven-e-ja" as the Finnish name for Russia. During Viking-time the Scandinavians called the population east of the Baltic as "Van-a-land" (Old Norse). It is still adressed - in Danish - as "Vend-land".
Thus it should be clear that any academical capacity of ancient Europe was utterly aware of the Danes. The oldest trade known to cross France or Balkan is more than 7.000 years old. Since these insigths were rather just a decade a go there are many that still dont understand how the Danoi/Tanaja/Danya could be representatives of the Kingdom of Denmark.
--
TRACING DAN
By Walter W. Baucum
In The Tribes, Yair Davidy has an entire chapter on “The Order of Encampment in the Wilderness and Its Historical Significance.” He makes the point that some significance can be made from the tribal associations, which associations were commanded of them by the Eternal,(God of Moses) even from the beginning of their forty-year sojourn in the Exodus from Egypt. The point has been made earlier that some Danites probably left before the main part of Israel was enslaved, who themselves were later released by their Egyptian overlords. The greater part, though, left with the others during the historical Exodus. Numbers 2 tells us that the tribes were encamped in a specified order around the Tabernacle while in the Wilderness. Similarly, they were to proceed in a specified marching order, with Judah going first and Dan bringing up the rear (Numbers 10.
The camping order divided the twelve tribes into four groups of three, with the camping alignment having some parallelism to the familial order of Jacob and his wives. He asserts that this might be a clue to their whereabouts in modem times, since their “required” association would have established an affinity for one another not broken by future events. The last grouping of three is that dominated by Dan, his other neighbours being Asher (Scots of today) and Naphtali (the Norwegians). Among all the other peoples and nations that Dan might have become (or greatly influenced), are the Danes. Naphtali became the Nephtali who migrated to Norway. Both Denmark and Norway produced the Vikings, who invaded and settled in northern England in an area previously belonging to the Angles and Varin (Vandals) and before them, to the Brigantes. He continues his line of thought by saying the Anglo-Brigantian inhabitants of northern Britain were most likely from the Tribe of Asher (called “Aseir”).
These Aseir were considered ancestral gods by the Scandinavians, including those of Norway and Denmark. This same camping (living) alliance that had been theirs in the Wilderness, then, was retained in Scandinavia and in northern England.(21)
Briefly, the Naphtalites became divided by time, but the greater bulk went westward and became the Vikings of Scandinavia, especially of Norway.
“It was from Odin’s army, known as the ‘Svear,’ that Sweden takes its name. In their own language, the Swedes call their country ‘Sverige,’ — the ‘land of the Svear.’ The date of Odin is given variously as between C.E. 200 and 300. In the Herald’s College, London, there is a very ancient manuscript deducing the Saxon kings from Adam and from David. Odin is listed in the genealogy (as is also his wife, Frea) tracing the Royal House of Britain back to David.”
Whenever the Bible mentions “the Isles,” many of us have, in the past, believed them to be the British Isles. Psalms 72:10, for example, says, “The Kings of Tarshish and of the Isles...” Talmudic commentators explain that the “Isles” are those in the “Oceanic Sea,” meaning the Atlantic Ocean. The Talmud infers, too, that “Tarshish” actually means the Atlantic Ocean. We know that historically Tarshish was located on the southwest coast of Spain, and outposts of it were located in Britain and Gaul.
‘Ships of Tarshish’ means primarily those plying the Atlantic Ocean and therefore the ‘Isles’ mentioned in association with Tarshish and Israelites are presumably those of Britain, America, and the coastline of Northwest Europe since the term ‘Isle’ in Hebrew sometimes may be extended to include places by the coast. Even so, PRIMARILY — ‘EY’ in Hebrew means Land surrounded by water, i.e. an ‘isle’ or island.
“The term ‘Yarech’ in Hebrew means coastline whereas ‘ey’ nearly always means island. And Jeremiah uses the word ‘yerech’ coastline when speaking of the ‘North Country’ (Jeremiah 31:8-10). The expression ‘North Country’ could
apply to the whole of the Northwest European Coastline (including the British Isles) as well as to North America.”
To the early oceanic travelers, the North American continent would undoubtedly appear on maps as an “island.” That Scandinavia, whether the coastline only or the entire peninsula, would also be included in those prophecies concerning “the Isles,” seems conclusive. Later, the reader will see that North America’s being included definitely would seem to be a reasonable assumption.
The Man called Odin
During the 2nd millenium B.C. the region of Scandinavia (and particularly the peninsula of Denmark) became a chief area of trade and commerce. It was strategically located to dominate both the North and Baltic sea trade. So, together with the original German tribes of the CYMRY and DAUCIONES were migrants from Britain -- the HEBREW CYMRY transplanted by Hu the Mighty or Joshua of Jericho fame. "In 1040 [B.C.]" relates Herman L. Hoeh, "the HEBREW CYMRY called for a DESCENDANT OF JUDAH, A ROYAL SCION OF THE HOUSE OF TROY, to rule over them." "ODIN," continues Hoeh, "answered the call and led a migration OUT OF THRACE into DENMARK and neighboring regions" (Compendium of World History. Vol. II. Ambassador College, 1963. P. 50).
Also known as WODEN, WOTAN and DAN, Odin is the foremost hero of Norse mythology and, as such, was worshipped by the pagan forebears of the Anglo-Saxons, the Scandinavians, the Germans and THE CANAANITES in their midst!
As the chief god of the northern pantheon, he is said to have been the father of several legendary kings. "His exploits and adventures," notes the Encyclopedia Britannica, "are a common theme in the poetic and prose Eddas. Here his character is distinguished rather by wisdom than martial prowess, and reference is frequently made to his skill in poetry and magic" (Vol. 16, 1943 edition. P. 704).
Human sacrifices were frequently offered to ODIN, especially prisoners taken in battle; and the worship of ODIN seems to have prevailed chiefly, if not solely, in military circles. He was known to the Anglo-Saxons as WODEN, and to the Germans as WODAN (WUOTAN).
Writes Herman L. Hoeh: "In Danish history he is also called DAN I. He was the FIRST ODIN or VOTAN -- from the Hebrew ADONAI meaning 'lord.' Denmark originally received its name from the TRIBE OF DANAAN. It passed to the king who took the name of the subjects whom he ruled" (Compendium of World History, Vol. II, p. 43).
The magazine Wake Up!, in its August 1980 issue, explains that "whilst such deification of ancestors can only be deplored, there is firm reason to assert that ODIN WAS A MIGHTY LEADER OF THE ISRAEL PEOPLE during their westward trek from ancient Scythia [which included Thrace] -- the region to the north of the BLACK AND CASPIAN SEAS -- towards the fringe countries of the North Sea" (Covenant Publishing Co., Ltd. London. P. 18).
King DAN I, or ODIN, commenced his reign in Scandinavia in the year 1040 B.C. and his line, the sagas reveal, stretched all the way back to TROY! "The repeated assertions and implications," notes The Link magazine, "that the families descended from ODIN (or WODEN) derive from the ANCIENT TROJAN KINGS (often thought to belong to the fanciful category) may indeed prove to have FIRM FOUNDATION IN TRUTH."
"Several factors," continues this publication, "provide evidence which is harmonious with such a claim. Ancient classical and extra-Biblical sources indicate that the TROJAN KINGS were of the ROYAL LINE OF JUDAH and that they were closely related to other ROYAL FAMILIES IN IONA, GREECE AND CRETE. The early British king-line is traditionally DESCENDED THROUGH THE TROJAN KINGS, and the kings of Ireland are stated to have sprung from the MILESIAN ROYAL FAMILY in IONA into which 'Pharaoh's daughter' married."
"Accepting these sources," notes the magazine, "the royal families of the NORTHERN NATIONS OF EUROPE -- Irish-Scottish, Early British, Frankish, Norwegian -- are all of the SCEPTRE TRIBE OF JUDAH and the many intermarriages of these royal lines would thus all be within the one great royal family of which so much is prophesied in Scripture. Queen Elizabeth II has stated that she is WODEN-BORN" (Dec. 1981. Christian Israel Foundation, Walsall, England. P. 117).
The genealogy of Odin is traced by Gladys Taylor when she states that "the royal families of England [and] Wales...sprang from BRUTUS THE TROJAN, while those of the SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES came from ODIN, whose genealogy," she confirms, "as given in the Prologue to the Prose Edda, is traced TO PRIAM KING OF TROY..." (The Magnet of the Isles. The Covenant Book Co., Ltd. London, 1971. P. 37).
From Priam Herman L. Hoeh traces Odin's lineage all the way back to Jacob! (See Compendium of World History, Vol. II. P. 48).
DRAKIA - TRAKIA - THRAKIA - TRACE
Thrace," notes the Encyclopedia Britannica , "[is] a name applied at various periods to areas of different extent....The boundaries of the ROMAN PROVINCE OF THRACE were -- north, the Haemus; east, THE EUXINE SEA [BLACK SEA]; south, the Propontis, the HELLESPONT and the AEGEAN; and west, the Nestus. The distinguishing features of the country were the mountain chain of Rhodope (Despotodagh) and THE RIVER HEBRUS (Maritza)." "The HEBRUS," continues the Britannica, "with its tributaries, drains almost the whole of THRACE" (1943 edition. Vol. 22, p. 159).
Thrace was inhabited by indigenous tribes, as well as by Celtic [Israelite] Tribes such as the Getas. The aboriginal inhabitants were the RED-SKINNED THRACIANS mentioned by the Greek writers and they differed from the Celtic tribes not only in complexion but also in customs and religion. (Herodotos, V. 14.)
(The native Thracians were called RED-SKINS by the Greeks. and the word "Phoenician" means reddish dye in the Greek language.)
Aboriginal Thracians and the Native Illyrians
(Could we assume that Illyrians are Lyrian Descendent?)
MOUND BUILDERS....
The most outstanding archaeological monuments of this prehistoric period are the MOUND-LIKE TOMBS, that were generally located in the outskirts of the ancient cities....There is no well-defined difference between the aboriginal Thracians and the native Illyrians. All of the Thracian tribes and the Illyrian tribes practiced TATTOOING, which distinguished them from the Celtic tribes that had from time to time dominated them.
Tracians established themselves in 5th Century BC
PICS
Picts arrived in Scotland and England from Trace and Illyria. The Thracians and Illyrians observed and practiced the very same customs that were observed by the Picts of the British Isles
GODDESS WORSHIP
Herodotus and other Greek historians portrayed the Illyrians as a semi-savage people; they viewed them as the most savage tribes of Thrace. Both peoples they described as practitioners of the art of tattooing. They painted their bodies and sacrificed human victims to their gods. They were a matriarchal socieity, with the women of Illyria occupying exalted positionsin tribal society and even exercised political authority. The queens are referred to as despots or royal personages. -- Vol. XIV, p. 326. Article "Illyria."
The people of Illyria practiced the very same customs we find among the Picts and the Indian tribes of America! These peoples are protrayed as completely different from those of other European peoples including the Celts.
A custom unique to the Thracians was tattooing. The nobles painted the hair of their head blue.
It was FROM THRACE that ODIN led THE AGATHYRSI and OTHER TRIBES to northwestern Europe when he founded the Danish kingdom.
Many of the warriors employed by the early princes of western Europe were FIERCE, OF SWARTHY SKIN, NAKED AND OFTEN TATTOOED AND PAINTED. Strabo, the Roman geographer, wrote that AREAS OF IRELAND AND BRITAIN were inhabited "by MEN ENTIRELY WILD." Jerome, writing in one of his letters in the fifth century, characterizes some of them as cannibals...
When ODIN migrated from Thrace to the area of Scandinavia he led a MIXED THRONG of people -- including the Pactyae or Picts who were descendants of the CANAANITES Joshua drove out of the Promised Land.
At the time of Odin's great migration Thrace was populated by various of the Canaanite tribes who had fled from Canaan as the Children of Israel invaded the land, as well as the children of Tiras, son of Japheth.
ODIN AND MAYAN INFLUENCE
Shortly after arriving in Scandinavia from Thrace, ODIN embarked on a venture that was to take him, along with his followers, thousands of miles across the ocean to a mystical land shrouded in legend. This was a result of the descendants of the original migrants seeking to establish their kingdom and authority over the people: "And then they remembered what had been said about THE EAST. This is when they remembered the instructions of their fathers. The ancient things received from their fathers were not lost. The tribes gave them their wives, becoming their fathers-in-law as they took wives. And there were THREE OF THEM who said, as they were about to go away: 'We are GOING TO THE EAST, WHERE OUR FATHERS CAME FROM,' they said, then they followed their road...There were only THREE [who went across the sea], but they had skill and knowledge....They advised all their brothers, elder and younger, who were left behind. They were glad to go: 'We're not dying. We're coming back,' they said when they went, yet it was these same three who WENT CLEAR ACROSS THE SEA. And then they ARRIVED IN THE EAST; THEY WENT THERE TO RECEIVE LORDSHIP" ( Popol Vuh: The Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life, translated by Dennis Tedlock. A Touchstone Book, published by Simon & Schuster. N.Y. 1986. P. 203).
"SONS [descendants] OF THE PRIEST-KINGS RETURNED TO THE EAST, where they received from the KING OF THE EAST the insignia and symbols of ROYALTY, including the canopy and throne. They then RETURNED TO RULE THE TRIBES" (ibid.,).
Where did these Quiche Maya journey to? From what line of great kings in the EAST did they receive their royal authority? From a descendant of the GREAT TOLTEC RULER who conducted their ancestors to TULA IN MEXICO shortly after the Exodus! And WHO was this descendant of the "great ruler"?
MAYAN KNOWLEDGE - Amag-Dan
In The Two Babylons, compiled by Alexander Hislop, the author tells us that "from the researches of Humboldt we find that THE MEXICANS CELEBRATED WODAN AS THE FOUNDER OF THEIR RACE, just as our own ancestors did. The WODAN or ODIN OF SCANDINAVIA can be proved to be the [same as]...the WODAN OF MEXICO..." Continues Hislop: "...the fact that that name had been borne by some illustrious hero among the supposed ANCESTORS OF THE MEXICAN RACE, is put BEYOND ALL DOUBT by the singular circumstance that THE MEXICANS HAD ONE OF THEIR DAYS CALLED WODANSDAY, exactly as we ourselves have" (Loizeaux Brothers, N.J. 1959. Pp. 133-134).
Is it mere coincidence that the MAYAS claim that their kingdom was founded by a great EASTERN RULER NAMED ODEN OR VOTAN OR DAN by some of their tribes? According to legend he was a WHITE MAN who CAME BY SEA FROM THE EAST, bringing an infusion of new people to their land. When did this occur? TEN CENTURIES BEFORE THE TIME OF CHRIST, notes the historian Ordonez!
This VOTAN -- who was also worshipped as a god -- was famous for having himself journeyed to a land where a great TEMPLE was being built.
Do we have a king in Europe, living at the time SOLOMON'S TEMPLE was being built (around 1000 B.C.), who had dominion OVER THE SEAS, who was worshipped as a God, and whose name sounded like Votan? Indeed -- WODEN or ODIN, KING OF DENMARK from 1040-999 [B.C.]. He was worshipped later as a great god. Scandinavian literature is replete with accounts of his DISTANT JOURNEYS which took him away from his homeland for many months, sometimes years. -- Compendium of World History, Vol. II. P. 91.
In the Native Races of the Pacific States, by Hubert H. Bancroft, we find that ODIN gave his name to the "FOREST OF DAN" in the land of the QUICHE INDIANS -- just as KING ODIN or DANUS gave his name to DENMARK (DANMARK) (Pp. 163 & 549 -- Vol. V). Also, "DAN...founded a monarchy on the GUATEMALAN PLATEAU" (Vol. I, p. 789). Odin's capital in Mesoamerica -- built for the Canaanites he brought from the east -- was called AMAG-DAN.
The book Fingerprints of the Gods mentions that "there were other gods, among the Maya..., whose identities seemed to merge closely with those of Quetzalcoatl. One was VOTAN, a great civilizer, who was described as pale-skinned, bearded and wearing a long robe. Scholars could offer no translation for his name but his principal symbol, like that of Quetzalcoatl, was a serpent." (By Graham Hanthingy. Crown Trade Paperbacks, N.Y. 1995. P. 103.)
THE TRIBE OF DAN
SERPENT RACE OF THE MAYANS
This Votan was also known as Itzamana; and the Mayan religious texts known as the Books of Chilam Balaam, reported that "the first inhabitants of Yucatan were the 'People of the Serpent.' They came from the EAST in boats across the water with their leader Itzamana, 'Serpent of the East,' a healer who could cure by laying on hands, and who revived the dead."
(Note here that times haven't changed much in symbolism.. the entwined serpent represents the field of medicine...physicians)
It is more than interesting to note that the foremost symbol of the Israelite tribe of DAN was the SERPENT; and McClintock and Strong, in their encyclopedia of religious knowledge, tell us that the standard of three Israelite tribes -- DAN, NAPHTALI and ASHER -- was a serpent or basilisk, with the motto: "Return, O Jehovah, unto the many thousands of Israel." Yair Davidy, in his work The Tribes, states that "the Tribe of Dan was represented by a SNAKE...[and] the symbol of a snake was once worshipped in Ireland" (p. 211).
(Ref. the Irish folklore , "...driving the serpents out of Ireland."
Danans introduces Worship
...they had knowledge of only one God who created heaven and earth and everything, and [they knew] that his seat [of government] was in heaven. They were [at] one time with knowledge of this only God, to whom they had erected [a] TEMPLE with priests, to which [priests] they brought presents and alms so that they had this manner of worship until A GREAT LORD, called Rurulcan [Kukulcan], came from OUTSIDE THIS LAND with people, for he and his people worshipped idols; and from here those of the land commenced to worship idols...
Relacion de Quinacama o Moxpipe, Sautillana and Xiu narrated:
The ancient ones of this province say that anciently...they did not worship idols in this land. After the Mexicans entered it and possessed it, a captain who was called Quetzalquat [Quetzalcoatl] in the Mexican language (that is to say in our [language], plumage of a snake, and among themselves they give this name to the serpent because they say that it has plumage) INTRODUCED IDOLATRY and the use of idols as gods in this land, which [idols] he made them make from wood, clay, and stone. He made [them] worship them, and they offered them many things of the hunt and merchandise and above all BLOOD from their noses and ears and THE HEARTS OF SOME WHOM THEY SACRIFICED in their service. They perfumed them with smokes of copal, which is the incense of this land; and this custom remained until the conquistadores conquered them.
Mayan and Aztec texts state that this man, claiming descent from the sun, arrived from the Gulf of Mexico with a complement of astronomers, architects and priests. The Aztecs called the man/god Quetzalcoatl, and the Mayans called him Kukulcan. These men wore sandals and robes and taught the natives to write, build, weave and worship the sun. The texts also reveal that they built schools primarily for teaching history.
This "Kukulcan" or "Quetzalcoatl" was, of course, Odin or Votan of Scandinavia who introduced idolatry and human sacrifice into Mesoamerica. He was the third Quetzalcoatl.
So here we have the records of a DANISH KING sailing across the ocean to Mesoamerica and planting COLONIES OF RED MEN FROM EUROPE and Thrace in the YUCATAN and GUATEMALAN HIGHLANDS -- as early as 1000 years before Christ! After vesting the visiting descendants of the priest-kings who founded Tula with the symbols of royalty and rulership, Odin traveled back to Mesoamerica with them, planting new colonies of Canaanites in the Yucatan and Guatemalan highlands. The newly vested priest-kings were placed in rulership over them. It is a FACT that Mesoamerican traditions universally assign WHITE LEADERS to every major recorded historic migration from northwestern Europe.
The Old World in Jepardy
With the fall of the Persian Empire in 331 B.C., the last remaining CANAANITES in Asia Minor disappeared from the area. Many other nations who had been held in virtual slavery gained their freedom at this time -- including the House of Israel. In the year 331-330 the Israelites, along with the remnant of Canaanites and some other races, journeyed out of this area to the northwest, eventually arriving in Scotland.
Archaeological proof of the Canaanites' later movements can be found in the skeletons unearthed in Asia minor:
Measuring techniques have become so ACCURATE that RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS are now distinguishable with a FAIR DEGREE OF CERTAINTY. The HITTITES, too, can be studied from this aspect. In 1958 the Deutche Orientgesellschaft devoted its 71st scientific publication to some HITTITE GRAVES discovered six years earlier in the immediate vicinity of the capital, HATTUSA, below a spur of rock named Osmankayasi after the owner of the neighbouring field. Excavation of this burial-ground yielded 50 cremation burials and 22 skeletons.
Taken in conjunction with other finds made in ANATOLIA, these human remains enabled experts to distinguish THE HITTITES FROM OTHER RACES. To quote the publication mentioned above: 'If we temporarily disregard the human types portrayed in Hittite art and focus our attention on SHAPE OF SKULL ALONE, THE HITTITES can be typologically classified....During Anatolia's PRE-HITTITE PERIOD [prior to approximately 1447 B.C.], or in the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages, NARROW-SKULLED TYPES are found. In the MIDDLE BRONZE AGE [after about 1447 B.C.]... BRACHYCEPHALIC TYPES occur in the CENTRAL ANATOLIAN REGION. After...the COLLAPSE OF THE CENTRAL HITTITE EMPIRE [331 B.C.]these gave way to DOLICHOCEPHALICS who were later (in Greek and, more particularly, Roman times) succeeded by the BRACHYCEPHALICS who still predominate in our own day. The likely inference is that HITTITE SETTLERS [from Canaan] INTRODUCED THESE BRACHYCEPHALIC SKULLS INTO CENTRAL ANATOLIA [in the Middle Bronze Age]. The Hittites: People of a Thousand Gods, pp. 83-84.
Wherever the Canaanites went as they traveled across Europe, they left BRACHYCEPHALIC skulls of their dead as markers of the route they took.
"The native monuments, together with the Egyptian reliefs representing Hittites, showed the physical characteristics of the Hittite race; in particular, the GREAT CURVED NOSE and BACKWARD SLOPING FOREHEAD, which proved beyond any dispute that the Hittites were not Semites or Indo-Europeans. The hieroglyphic writing of the Hittites has nothing to do with the Egyptian hieroglyphic script. It is a PICTOGRAPHIC SCRIPT; but the original meaning of many of the signs is still obscure" (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1943 edition. Vol. 11, p. 599).
The Britannica goes on to say: "Not only the mixed character of the Hittite language, but also the physical characters of the "Hittite" race, its HYPERBRACHYCEPHALOUS SKULL, the LARGE HOOKED NOSE and SLOPING FOREHEAD, suggested the hypothesis that here an Indo-European nation is mingled with a NON-Indo-European race" (ibid., p. 602). If you study pictures of the ancient Maya you will see these SAME physical features present - indicating, with other similarities, a COMMON ancestry.
MESOLITTIC AND NEOLITTIC EUROPE
According to various sources the Dan-ish kingdom is Europe`s oldest. If Professor John Hawks is rigth - modern man wandered into Europe from the north. Then we will have a perfectly clear clue to the origin of the European (agri-) culture - being the first Danes.
This is also agreed by the saga-material, which says that "Dans line spread from Jul-land, cultivating the western part of Northern Europe".
Today we seem to call them either "German" or "Celts" - since Caesar named them all after the south-western region of Gallia. The close paralells between archeoligical items from Germans, Celts, Langobards and others have proven that this "Celtic cultures" have spread from Biscaya to western shores of The Black Sea.
From here you may follow the river-system northwards - to the river Wizla, that still run out by DAN-ZIG.
The artefacts from mesolitticum, neolitticum and broze age have proven that the Wizla river have been the MAIN border (and the only clear one) throughout ancient Europe. Even England is part of that culture.
CHARACTERISTICS
The characteristics of the ceramics, tools and architecture west of Wizla is coherent - way to the Atlantic. From Julland to Moldau, from Malmo to Marseilles. Thus it is known that they traded and mixed with the Thrakian/Makedonian in the south - and the Fenno-Ugrians (Schytians/Russians) in the east.
At this time the collective name for the nort-west was not "Europeans". But rather Danaoi.
"Dan-ae" actually says "Danish" - probably as feminium. "Dan-a-ya" and "Tanaja" sounds as "The Danes" - or "The land of the Danes". The Irish referred to the first agriculturalist as Tuatha de Danaan.
Still today we find "Ven-e-ja" as the Finnish name for Russia. During Viking-time the Scandinavians called the population east of the Baltic as "Van-a-land" (Old Norse). It is still adressed - in Danish - as "Vend-land".
Thus it should be clear that any academical capacity of ancient Europe was utterly aware of the Danes. The oldest trade known to cross France or Balkan is more than 7.000 years old. Since these insigths were rather just a decade a go there are many that still dont understand how the Danoi/Tanaja/Danya could be representatives of the Kingdom of Denmark.
--
TRACING DAN
By Walter W. Baucum
In The Tribes, Yair Davidy has an entire chapter on “The Order of Encampment in the Wilderness and Its Historical Significance.” He makes the point that some significance can be made from the tribal associations, which associations were commanded of them by the Eternal,(God of Moses) even from the beginning of their forty-year sojourn in the Exodus from Egypt. The point has been made earlier that some Danites probably left before the main part of Israel was enslaved, who themselves were later released by their Egyptian overlords. The greater part, though, left with the others during the historical Exodus. Numbers 2 tells us that the tribes were encamped in a specified order around the Tabernacle while in the Wilderness. Similarly, they were to proceed in a specified marching order, with Judah going first and Dan bringing up the rear (Numbers 10.
The camping order divided the twelve tribes into four groups of three, with the camping alignment having some parallelism to the familial order of Jacob and his wives. He asserts that this might be a clue to their whereabouts in modem times, since their “required” association would have established an affinity for one another not broken by future events. The last grouping of three is that dominated by Dan, his other neighbours being Asher (Scots of today) and Naphtali (the Norwegians). Among all the other peoples and nations that Dan might have become (or greatly influenced), are the Danes. Naphtali became the Nephtali who migrated to Norway. Both Denmark and Norway produced the Vikings, who invaded and settled in northern England in an area previously belonging to the Angles and Varin (Vandals) and before them, to the Brigantes. He continues his line of thought by saying the Anglo-Brigantian inhabitants of northern Britain were most likely from the Tribe of Asher (called “Aseir”).
These Aseir were considered ancestral gods by the Scandinavians, including those of Norway and Denmark. This same camping (living) alliance that had been theirs in the Wilderness, then, was retained in Scandinavia and in northern England.(21)
Briefly, the Naphtalites became divided by time, but the greater bulk went westward and became the Vikings of Scandinavia, especially of Norway.
“It was from Odin’s army, known as the ‘Svear,’ that Sweden takes its name. In their own language, the Swedes call their country ‘Sverige,’ — the ‘land of the Svear.’ The date of Odin is given variously as between C.E. 200 and 300. In the Herald’s College, London, there is a very ancient manuscript deducing the Saxon kings from Adam and from David. Odin is listed in the genealogy (as is also his wife, Frea) tracing the Royal House of Britain back to David.”
Whenever the Bible mentions “the Isles,” many of us have, in the past, believed them to be the British Isles. Psalms 72:10, for example, says, “The Kings of Tarshish and of the Isles...” Talmudic commentators explain that the “Isles” are those in the “Oceanic Sea,” meaning the Atlantic Ocean. The Talmud infers, too, that “Tarshish” actually means the Atlantic Ocean. We know that historically Tarshish was located on the southwest coast of Spain, and outposts of it were located in Britain and Gaul.
‘Ships of Tarshish’ means primarily those plying the Atlantic Ocean and therefore the ‘Isles’ mentioned in association with Tarshish and Israelites are presumably those of Britain, America, and the coastline of Northwest Europe since the term ‘Isle’ in Hebrew sometimes may be extended to include places by the coast. Even so, PRIMARILY — ‘EY’ in Hebrew means Land surrounded by water, i.e. an ‘isle’ or island.
“The term ‘Yarech’ in Hebrew means coastline whereas ‘ey’ nearly always means island. And Jeremiah uses the word ‘yerech’ coastline when speaking of the ‘North Country’ (Jeremiah 31:8-10). The expression ‘North Country’ could
apply to the whole of the Northwest European Coastline (including the British Isles) as well as to North America.”
To the early oceanic travelers, the North American continent would undoubtedly appear on maps as an “island.” That Scandinavia, whether the coastline only or the entire peninsula, would also be included in those prophecies concerning “the Isles,” seems conclusive. Later, the reader will see that North America’s being included definitely would seem to be a reasonable assumption.
The Man called Odin
During the 2nd millenium B.C. the region of Scandinavia (and particularly the peninsula of Denmark) became a chief area of trade and commerce. It was strategically located to dominate both the North and Baltic sea trade. So, together with the original German tribes of the CYMRY and DAUCIONES were migrants from Britain -- the HEBREW CYMRY transplanted by Hu the Mighty or Joshua of Jericho fame. "In 1040 [B.C.]" relates Herman L. Hoeh, "the HEBREW CYMRY called for a DESCENDANT OF JUDAH, A ROYAL SCION OF THE HOUSE OF TROY, to rule over them." "ODIN," continues Hoeh, "answered the call and led a migration OUT OF THRACE into DENMARK and neighboring regions" (Compendium of World History. Vol. II. Ambassador College, 1963. P. 50).
Also known as WODEN, WOTAN and DAN, Odin is the foremost hero of Norse mythology and, as such, was worshipped by the pagan forebears of the Anglo-Saxons, the Scandinavians, the Germans and THE CANAANITES in their midst!
As the chief god of the northern pantheon, he is said to have been the father of several legendary kings. "His exploits and adventures," notes the Encyclopedia Britannica, "are a common theme in the poetic and prose Eddas. Here his character is distinguished rather by wisdom than martial prowess, and reference is frequently made to his skill in poetry and magic" (Vol. 16, 1943 edition. P. 704).
Human sacrifices were frequently offered to ODIN, especially prisoners taken in battle; and the worship of ODIN seems to have prevailed chiefly, if not solely, in military circles. He was known to the Anglo-Saxons as WODEN, and to the Germans as WODAN (WUOTAN).
Writes Herman L. Hoeh: "In Danish history he is also called DAN I. He was the FIRST ODIN or VOTAN -- from the Hebrew ADONAI meaning 'lord.' Denmark originally received its name from the TRIBE OF DANAAN. It passed to the king who took the name of the subjects whom he ruled" (Compendium of World History, Vol. II, p. 43).
The magazine Wake Up!, in its August 1980 issue, explains that "whilst such deification of ancestors can only be deplored, there is firm reason to assert that ODIN WAS A MIGHTY LEADER OF THE ISRAEL PEOPLE during their westward trek from ancient Scythia [which included Thrace] -- the region to the north of the BLACK AND CASPIAN SEAS -- towards the fringe countries of the North Sea" (Covenant Publishing Co., Ltd. London. P. 18).
King DAN I, or ODIN, commenced his reign in Scandinavia in the year 1040 B.C. and his line, the sagas reveal, stretched all the way back to TROY! "The repeated assertions and implications," notes The Link magazine, "that the families descended from ODIN (or WODEN) derive from the ANCIENT TROJAN KINGS (often thought to belong to the fanciful category) may indeed prove to have FIRM FOUNDATION IN TRUTH."
"Several factors," continues this publication, "provide evidence which is harmonious with such a claim. Ancient classical and extra-Biblical sources indicate that the TROJAN KINGS were of the ROYAL LINE OF JUDAH and that they were closely related to other ROYAL FAMILIES IN IONA, GREECE AND CRETE. The early British king-line is traditionally DESCENDED THROUGH THE TROJAN KINGS, and the kings of Ireland are stated to have sprung from the MILESIAN ROYAL FAMILY in IONA into which 'Pharaoh's daughter' married."
"Accepting these sources," notes the magazine, "the royal families of the NORTHERN NATIONS OF EUROPE -- Irish-Scottish, Early British, Frankish, Norwegian -- are all of the SCEPTRE TRIBE OF JUDAH and the many intermarriages of these royal lines would thus all be within the one great royal family of which so much is prophesied in Scripture. Queen Elizabeth II has stated that she is WODEN-BORN" (Dec. 1981. Christian Israel Foundation, Walsall, England. P. 117).
The genealogy of Odin is traced by Gladys Taylor when she states that "the royal families of England [and] Wales...sprang from BRUTUS THE TROJAN, while those of the SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES came from ODIN, whose genealogy," she confirms, "as given in the Prologue to the Prose Edda, is traced TO PRIAM KING OF TROY..." (The Magnet of the Isles. The Covenant Book Co., Ltd. London, 1971. P. 37).
From Priam Herman L. Hoeh traces Odin's lineage all the way back to Jacob! (See Compendium of World History, Vol. II. P. 48).
DRAKIA - TRAKIA - THRAKIA - TRACE
Thrace," notes the Encyclopedia Britannica , "[is] a name applied at various periods to areas of different extent....The boundaries of the ROMAN PROVINCE OF THRACE were -- north, the Haemus; east, THE EUXINE SEA [BLACK SEA]; south, the Propontis, the HELLESPONT and the AEGEAN; and west, the Nestus. The distinguishing features of the country were the mountain chain of Rhodope (Despotodagh) and THE RIVER HEBRUS (Maritza)." "The HEBRUS," continues the Britannica, "with its tributaries, drains almost the whole of THRACE" (1943 edition. Vol. 22, p. 159).
Thrace was inhabited by indigenous tribes, as well as by Celtic [Israelite] Tribes such as the Getas. The aboriginal inhabitants were the RED-SKINNED THRACIANS mentioned by the Greek writers and they differed from the Celtic tribes not only in complexion but also in customs and religion. (Herodotos, V. 14.)
(The native Thracians were called RED-SKINS by the Greeks. and the word "Phoenician" means reddish dye in the Greek language.)
Aboriginal Thracians and the Native Illyrians
(Could we assume that Illyrians are Lyrian Descendent?)
MOUND BUILDERS....
The most outstanding archaeological monuments of this prehistoric period are the MOUND-LIKE TOMBS, that were generally located in the outskirts of the ancient cities....There is no well-defined difference between the aboriginal Thracians and the native Illyrians. All of the Thracian tribes and the Illyrian tribes practiced TATTOOING, which distinguished them from the Celtic tribes that had from time to time dominated them.
Tracians established themselves in 5th Century BC
PICS
Picts arrived in Scotland and England from Trace and Illyria. The Thracians and Illyrians observed and practiced the very same customs that were observed by the Picts of the British Isles
GODDESS WORSHIP
Herodotus and other Greek historians portrayed the Illyrians as a semi-savage people; they viewed them as the most savage tribes of Thrace. Both peoples they described as practitioners of the art of tattooing. They painted their bodies and sacrificed human victims to their gods. They were a matriarchal socieity, with the women of Illyria occupying exalted positionsin tribal society and even exercised political authority. The queens are referred to as despots or royal personages. -- Vol. XIV, p. 326. Article "Illyria."
The people of Illyria practiced the very same customs we find among the Picts and the Indian tribes of America! These peoples are protrayed as completely different from those of other European peoples including the Celts.
A custom unique to the Thracians was tattooing. The nobles painted the hair of their head blue.
It was FROM THRACE that ODIN led THE AGATHYRSI and OTHER TRIBES to northwestern Europe when he founded the Danish kingdom.
Many of the warriors employed by the early princes of western Europe were FIERCE, OF SWARTHY SKIN, NAKED AND OFTEN TATTOOED AND PAINTED. Strabo, the Roman geographer, wrote that AREAS OF IRELAND AND BRITAIN were inhabited "by MEN ENTIRELY WILD." Jerome, writing in one of his letters in the fifth century, characterizes some of them as cannibals...
When ODIN migrated from Thrace to the area of Scandinavia he led a MIXED THRONG of people -- including the Pactyae or Picts who were descendants of the CANAANITES Joshua drove out of the Promised Land.
At the time of Odin's great migration Thrace was populated by various of the Canaanite tribes who had fled from Canaan as the Children of Israel invaded the land, as well as the children of Tiras, son of Japheth.
ODIN AND MAYAN INFLUENCE
Shortly after arriving in Scandinavia from Thrace, ODIN embarked on a venture that was to take him, along with his followers, thousands of miles across the ocean to a mystical land shrouded in legend. This was a result of the descendants of the original migrants seeking to establish their kingdom and authority over the people: "And then they remembered what had been said about THE EAST. This is when they remembered the instructions of their fathers. The ancient things received from their fathers were not lost. The tribes gave them their wives, becoming their fathers-in-law as they took wives. And there were THREE OF THEM who said, as they were about to go away: 'We are GOING TO THE EAST, WHERE OUR FATHERS CAME FROM,' they said, then they followed their road...There were only THREE [who went across the sea], but they had skill and knowledge....They advised all their brothers, elder and younger, who were left behind. They were glad to go: 'We're not dying. We're coming back,' they said when they went, yet it was these same three who WENT CLEAR ACROSS THE SEA. And then they ARRIVED IN THE EAST; THEY WENT THERE TO RECEIVE LORDSHIP" ( Popol Vuh: The Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life, translated by Dennis Tedlock. A Touchstone Book, published by Simon & Schuster. N.Y. 1986. P. 203).
"SONS [descendants] OF THE PRIEST-KINGS RETURNED TO THE EAST, where they received from the KING OF THE EAST the insignia and symbols of ROYALTY, including the canopy and throne. They then RETURNED TO RULE THE TRIBES" (ibid.,).
Where did these Quiche Maya journey to? From what line of great kings in the EAST did they receive their royal authority? From a descendant of the GREAT TOLTEC RULER who conducted their ancestors to TULA IN MEXICO shortly after the Exodus! And WHO was this descendant of the "great ruler"?
MAYAN KNOWLEDGE - Amag-Dan
In The Two Babylons, compiled by Alexander Hislop, the author tells us that "from the researches of Humboldt we find that THE MEXICANS CELEBRATED WODAN AS THE FOUNDER OF THEIR RACE, just as our own ancestors did. The WODAN or ODIN OF SCANDINAVIA can be proved to be the [same as]...the WODAN OF MEXICO..." Continues Hislop: "...the fact that that name had been borne by some illustrious hero among the supposed ANCESTORS OF THE MEXICAN RACE, is put BEYOND ALL DOUBT by the singular circumstance that THE MEXICANS HAD ONE OF THEIR DAYS CALLED WODANSDAY, exactly as we ourselves have" (Loizeaux Brothers, N.J. 1959. Pp. 133-134).
Is it mere coincidence that the MAYAS claim that their kingdom was founded by a great EASTERN RULER NAMED ODEN OR VOTAN OR DAN by some of their tribes? According to legend he was a WHITE MAN who CAME BY SEA FROM THE EAST, bringing an infusion of new people to their land. When did this occur? TEN CENTURIES BEFORE THE TIME OF CHRIST, notes the historian Ordonez!
This VOTAN -- who was also worshipped as a god -- was famous for having himself journeyed to a land where a great TEMPLE was being built.
Do we have a king in Europe, living at the time SOLOMON'S TEMPLE was being built (around 1000 B.C.), who had dominion OVER THE SEAS, who was worshipped as a God, and whose name sounded like Votan? Indeed -- WODEN or ODIN, KING OF DENMARK from 1040-999 [B.C.]. He was worshipped later as a great god. Scandinavian literature is replete with accounts of his DISTANT JOURNEYS which took him away from his homeland for many months, sometimes years. -- Compendium of World History, Vol. II. P. 91.
In the Native Races of the Pacific States, by Hubert H. Bancroft, we find that ODIN gave his name to the "FOREST OF DAN" in the land of the QUICHE INDIANS -- just as KING ODIN or DANUS gave his name to DENMARK (DANMARK) (Pp. 163 & 549 -- Vol. V). Also, "DAN...founded a monarchy on the GUATEMALAN PLATEAU" (Vol. I, p. 789). Odin's capital in Mesoamerica -- built for the Canaanites he brought from the east -- was called AMAG-DAN.
The book Fingerprints of the Gods mentions that "there were other gods, among the Maya..., whose identities seemed to merge closely with those of Quetzalcoatl. One was VOTAN, a great civilizer, who was described as pale-skinned, bearded and wearing a long robe. Scholars could offer no translation for his name but his principal symbol, like that of Quetzalcoatl, was a serpent." (By Graham Hanthingy. Crown Trade Paperbacks, N.Y. 1995. P. 103.)
THE TRIBE OF DAN
SERPENT RACE OF THE MAYANS
This Votan was also known as Itzamana; and the Mayan religious texts known as the Books of Chilam Balaam, reported that "the first inhabitants of Yucatan were the 'People of the Serpent.' They came from the EAST in boats across the water with their leader Itzamana, 'Serpent of the East,' a healer who could cure by laying on hands, and who revived the dead."
(Note here that times haven't changed much in symbolism.. the entwined serpent represents the field of medicine...physicians)
It is more than interesting to note that the foremost symbol of the Israelite tribe of DAN was the SERPENT; and McClintock and Strong, in their encyclopedia of religious knowledge, tell us that the standard of three Israelite tribes -- DAN, NAPHTALI and ASHER -- was a serpent or basilisk, with the motto: "Return, O Jehovah, unto the many thousands of Israel." Yair Davidy, in his work The Tribes, states that "the Tribe of Dan was represented by a SNAKE...[and] the symbol of a snake was once worshipped in Ireland" (p. 211).
(Ref. the Irish folklore , "...driving the serpents out of Ireland."
Danans introduces Worship
...they had knowledge of only one God who created heaven and earth and everything, and [they knew] that his seat [of government] was in heaven. They were [at] one time with knowledge of this only God, to whom they had erected [a] TEMPLE with priests, to which [priests] they brought presents and alms so that they had this manner of worship until A GREAT LORD, called Rurulcan [Kukulcan], came from OUTSIDE THIS LAND with people, for he and his people worshipped idols; and from here those of the land commenced to worship idols...
Relacion de Quinacama o Moxpipe, Sautillana and Xiu narrated:
The ancient ones of this province say that anciently...they did not worship idols in this land. After the Mexicans entered it and possessed it, a captain who was called Quetzalquat [Quetzalcoatl] in the Mexican language (that is to say in our [language], plumage of a snake, and among themselves they give this name to the serpent because they say that it has plumage) INTRODUCED IDOLATRY and the use of idols as gods in this land, which [idols] he made them make from wood, clay, and stone. He made [them] worship them, and they offered them many things of the hunt and merchandise and above all BLOOD from their noses and ears and THE HEARTS OF SOME WHOM THEY SACRIFICED in their service. They perfumed them with smokes of copal, which is the incense of this land; and this custom remained until the conquistadores conquered them.
Mayan and Aztec texts state that this man, claiming descent from the sun, arrived from the Gulf of Mexico with a complement of astronomers, architects and priests. The Aztecs called the man/god Quetzalcoatl, and the Mayans called him Kukulcan. These men wore sandals and robes and taught the natives to write, build, weave and worship the sun. The texts also reveal that they built schools primarily for teaching history.
This "Kukulcan" or "Quetzalcoatl" was, of course, Odin or Votan of Scandinavia who introduced idolatry and human sacrifice into Mesoamerica. He was the third Quetzalcoatl.
So here we have the records of a DANISH KING sailing across the ocean to Mesoamerica and planting COLONIES OF RED MEN FROM EUROPE and Thrace in the YUCATAN and GUATEMALAN HIGHLANDS -- as early as 1000 years before Christ! After vesting the visiting descendants of the priest-kings who founded Tula with the symbols of royalty and rulership, Odin traveled back to Mesoamerica with them, planting new colonies of Canaanites in the Yucatan and Guatemalan highlands. The newly vested priest-kings were placed in rulership over them. It is a FACT that Mesoamerican traditions universally assign WHITE LEADERS to every major recorded historic migration from northwestern Europe.
The Old World in Jepardy
With the fall of the Persian Empire in 331 B.C., the last remaining CANAANITES in Asia Minor disappeared from the area. Many other nations who had been held in virtual slavery gained their freedom at this time -- including the House of Israel. In the year 331-330 the Israelites, along with the remnant of Canaanites and some other races, journeyed out of this area to the northwest, eventually arriving in Scotland.
Archaeological proof of the Canaanites' later movements can be found in the skeletons unearthed in Asia minor:
Measuring techniques have become so ACCURATE that RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS are now distinguishable with a FAIR DEGREE OF CERTAINTY. The HITTITES, too, can be studied from this aspect. In 1958 the Deutche Orientgesellschaft devoted its 71st scientific publication to some HITTITE GRAVES discovered six years earlier in the immediate vicinity of the capital, HATTUSA, below a spur of rock named Osmankayasi after the owner of the neighbouring field. Excavation of this burial-ground yielded 50 cremation burials and 22 skeletons.
Taken in conjunction with other finds made in ANATOLIA, these human remains enabled experts to distinguish THE HITTITES FROM OTHER RACES. To quote the publication mentioned above: 'If we temporarily disregard the human types portrayed in Hittite art and focus our attention on SHAPE OF SKULL ALONE, THE HITTITES can be typologically classified....During Anatolia's PRE-HITTITE PERIOD [prior to approximately 1447 B.C.], or in the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages, NARROW-SKULLED TYPES are found. In the MIDDLE BRONZE AGE [after about 1447 B.C.]... BRACHYCEPHALIC TYPES occur in the CENTRAL ANATOLIAN REGION. After...the COLLAPSE OF THE CENTRAL HITTITE EMPIRE [331 B.C.]these gave way to DOLICHOCEPHALICS who were later (in Greek and, more particularly, Roman times) succeeded by the BRACHYCEPHALICS who still predominate in our own day. The likely inference is that HITTITE SETTLERS [from Canaan] INTRODUCED THESE BRACHYCEPHALIC SKULLS INTO CENTRAL ANATOLIA [in the Middle Bronze Age]. The Hittites: People of a Thousand Gods, pp. 83-84.
Wherever the Canaanites went as they traveled across Europe, they left BRACHYCEPHALIC skulls of their dead as markers of the route they took.
"The native monuments, together with the Egyptian reliefs representing Hittites, showed the physical characteristics of the Hittite race; in particular, the GREAT CURVED NOSE and BACKWARD SLOPING FOREHEAD, which proved beyond any dispute that the Hittites were not Semites or Indo-Europeans. The hieroglyphic writing of the Hittites has nothing to do with the Egyptian hieroglyphic script. It is a PICTOGRAPHIC SCRIPT; but the original meaning of many of the signs is still obscure" (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1943 edition. Vol. 11, p. 599).
The Britannica goes on to say: "Not only the mixed character of the Hittite language, but also the physical characters of the "Hittite" race, its HYPERBRACHYCEPHALOUS SKULL, the LARGE HOOKED NOSE and SLOPING FOREHEAD, suggested the hypothesis that here an Indo-European nation is mingled with a NON-Indo-European race" (ibid., p. 602). If you study pictures of the ancient Maya you will see these SAME physical features present - indicating, with other similarities, a COMMON ancestry.
domingo, 18 de enero de 2009
OÍD, OÍD, ISRAEL Y JUDÁ, CONJUNTAMENTE, LO QUE DICE VUESTRO ETERNO CREADOR EN SU PALABRA
Por : J. N. Robles Olarte
A pesar de los deseos insanos de los enemigos del pueblo Hebreo -Israel y Judá- como son los miembros de las religiones de éste mundo, del movimiento Zionista Internacional y de los propios de la religión Judía es de saberse que prevalecerá la voluntad de nuestro Eterno Creador en los ya próximos Días del Fin de que hablan las profecías de Isaías y Jeremías.
Lo que ahora vemos y vivimos no es otra cosa que el cumplimiento de la profecía descrita en el Salmo 83.
“Ciertamente que en el Eterno YHWH nuestro Creador está la salvación de Israel…Tú (Israel y Judá), pues, has fornicado con muchos amigos; más ¡vuélvete a Mí! Dice el Eterno”.
“Judá no se volvió a Mí de todo corazón, sino fingidamente, dice el Eterno YHWH”
“Porque Mi pueblo –ISRAEL- es necio, no Me conocieron ni han querido conocerme; son hijos ignorantes y no son entendidos; son sabios para hacer el mal, pero hacer el bien no supieron ni lo saben aún”
“”Vuélvete, oh rebelde Israel, dice el Eterno YHWH; no haré caer Mi ira sobre ti, porque misericordioso soy YO, dice el Eterno YHWH, no guardaré para siempre el enojo.”
“Convertíos, hijos rebeldes, venid que YO soy vuestro esposo; …os daré Pastores según Mi corazón, que os apacienten con ciencia y con inteligencia y…en aquél tiempo llamarán a Jerusalém : trono de YHWH, y todas las naciones vendrán a ella en el nombre de YHWH en Jerusalém: ni andarán más tras la dureza de su malvado corazón.”
“Porque hemos pecado contra el Eterno YHWH nuestro Creador, nosotros y y nuestros padres, desde nuestra juventud y hasta éste día, y no hemos escuchado la voz del Eterno nuestro Creador y Señor”
(Jeremías 3: 23b,, 1, 2, ;4:22 y Jeremías 3:14,15,17,25
sábado, 17 de enero de 2009
MESSAGE TO MEMBERS OF THE RELIGION OF JUDAISM
Editors Note: To get things into perspective I do not claim to be a prophet, much less the Messiah. When YHWH stands on the Mt. of Olives He will resurrect King David who will be the resurrected Messiah and Elijah the resurrected Prophet.
The following message to all Rabbis is a direct quote from the website http://www.voy.org. However, the author of that site does claim to be the Messiah. Although this man cannot be who he claims to be, I believe people of the religion of Judaism should thoughtfully consider what is stated. This is especially true in light of what appears to be coming soon down the pike.
REGARDING THE RELIGION
HaMashiach's Message To All Levite Kohanim
And To All Rabbis Throughout The World
"You, who are Levite Kohanim and Rabbis, are the teachers of my people, the Children of Israel. I ask that you consider the following words concerning what your Sages and Rabbis established long ago after the Babylonian Exile, and what is today called the religion of Judaism.
"Has the G-d of our fathers, the G-d of Abraham, the G-d of Isaac and the G-d of Jacob ever spoken the word "religion" from his mouth to any of his prophets or to any of his people? Has he ever commanded any of his people to establish a "religion" and to officially call it "Judaism"? Has the only true living G-d, the G-d of Israel ever commanded any of his people to classify and categorize themselves as either being Ultra-Orthodox, Orthodox, Ultra-Conservative, Conservative, Reform or Reconstructionists in defining themselves as being of a particular "religious sect"? To which of the Sages or Rabbis of many generations ago, or at anytime in this more than 2000 years, has YHWH G-d spoken to and commanded saying, "Go to the people and speak to them in my Holy name and command them, saying, `This says YHWH G-d, the G-d of Israel: You are to establish a religion, and you will call the religion Judaism. You are to become divided into different sects like the religions of the other nations. You will call these sects Ultra-Orthodox, Orthodox, Ultra-Conservative, Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionists. This is to be done so that the people will have a multiple choice to choose from so they may choose what suits them best regarding this religion I am commanding you to establish."
"Is not this merely imitating what began at the Tower of Babel, when men chose to do their own way and forsake the ways of YHWH G-d, which continued on through the Egyptians and all the pagan nations throughout? Is this not how they all ended up with so many "gods" to "idol worship"?
"In this "religion" of "Judaism", as it is at this present time, could it not be said there is an Ultra-Orthodox G-d of Israel, a Orthodox G-d of Israel, a Ultra-Conservative G-d of Israel, a Reform G-d of Israel and a Reconstructionist G-d of Israel? Is not each G-d of each of these sects worshipped differently? If so, they are not, nor can they be the same G-d. Is there any one who would dispute this?
"What is the difference in this form of "religion" and the Christian and Islamic forms of religion which also promote division among their people by this same method they call religion? Did not each of them imitate that which our forefathers established, just as our forefathers imitated the pagan nations that surrounded them. They assimilated with those nations (gentiles), just as the Jews for Jesus have assimilated with the gentiles religion of Christianity in this day and time. Show me a "religion" on this earth that is not made up of more than one "sect", with each saying they are the "righteous sect" in the religion of their god? The Christians even ran out of space for their different denominational sects, and now have more "Non" denominational sects than they have denominational ones. The Muslims of Islam imitated this for themselves as well. Is it any wonder?
"When anyone adds to or takes from that which YHWH G-d has commanded, then it is inevitable that the worship has become idol worship, meaning, the worship of another god other than YHWH G-d Al-mighty!
"Considering this, it may be that you will begin to understand why YHWH, the G-d of Israel became so angry at our forefathers, the kings, the princes, the priests, the lying prophets, and the people who followed in their ways, which were not the ways of YHWH. He became fiercely wrathful because of the jealousy they provoked him to by establishing this "religion" and the different "religious sects" within it. They had forsaken his ways to establish their own ways, and call it "his ways"? Why do you think the first command he has spoken in this more than 2000 years to all the Children of Israel is:
""Now, consider your ways this day and compare your ways with the ways of your forefathers who continually provoked me to great jealousy and anger."
"Do not think that I am saying that everything you are teaching my people is incorrect. This is not true. I am simply stating that the way of YHWH G-d is not religious. His way is not a religion. Nor is His way meant to be many different religious organizations. My people, the sheep of YHWH's flock, are divided because of this and they are not supposed to be divided! They are supposed to be ONE, in unity with one another and with YHWH our G-d, who is ONE! The way of YHWH is the way of life and the way we are to live our lives. The way of YHWH is Torah, the tree of life. The ways that men establish which they call "religion" is the mixture of the knowledge of good and evil and calling it good. The religions of men are the ways of death.
"Do not think I am attacking you or that I have anything against the Levite Kohanim (Priests) or the Rabbis who are caught up in all of this at this moment in time because of the influence that was passed down through time. I do not have anything against you. You simply do not yet know and understand. But, it is now being made known to you and you will have to decide whose voice it is you are going to hearken to. You must come to know for a certainty that it is the voice of YHWH, the G-d of Israel, and his voice only that you are truly being obedient to. You will then be required not to listen to the voices of those who will rebel against this message. Those who rebel are they who have intentionally chosen to continue in a way that is not the way of YHWH our G-d. They will have intentionally chosen to do their own way. By their rebellion, they have, in effect, self-anointed, self-ordained and self-appointed themselves to be spokesmen for YHWH G-d, the Holy One of Israel. He has not sent them, nor have they stood in his counsel and heard his word from his mouth!
"Consider this also. IF the G-d of Israel were so approving of what you and my brethren refer to as the "official religion" of the State of Israel, which is called Judaism; then why has it only been since it was created, formed and established by men after the Babylonian exile that all the curses of the covenant have been poured out upon our forefathers that eventually led to the total destruction of the second Temple in 70 C.E.? IF YHWH G-d were so approving of this "religion", would it not be that he would have allowed our forefathers to remain in the land of Israel and he would have poured out all his blessings on them?
"IF all we needed were the Torah, the Tanakh, the Talmudic writings of the Sages and Rabbis, and a religion to call our own, we sure wouldn't have any need for our G-d, YHWH, or for his Mashiach to come, now would we? There are plenty of Talmudic Scholars and Rabbis with superior knowledge and understanding concerning all matters relating to our G-d...so, why would we need a Mashiach to come? You could simply continue with the attitude, `All is well! Look at how far we have come and how much we have advanced in our knowledge and understanding. We have even been able to return to the land of Israel and establish a sovereign nation for ourselves. So why do we need a Mashiach to come?' Is this not really the unspoken attitude of the "religious" and the loudly spoken attitude of the "secular"?
"Which of these "religions" do you think the Mashiach of YHWH G-d, the G-d of Israel will join when he is revealed to his people, the Children of Israel? Will he make claim to any "religion", "religious sect" or "religious organization"? I will tell you now that I will not make claim to being associated with any religion or of any of these differing sects of the religion of Judaism. I am not here to assimilate with that which the Sages and Rabbis of old created, formed and established after the Babylonian exile. My whole reason for being is to establish the way of YHWH G-d in the earth. I will set my people free from this which YHWH G-d has not established or commanded to be. I and the Children of Israel will surely hearken to the voice of YHWH, the G-d of our fathers and to his voice only!!! He who is for YHWH G-d of Israel, the only true living G-d, be with me! www.voy.org
"Yliyahu ben Dovid
"HaMashiach of YHWH G-d
"1 Tishrei, 5760"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editors Note:
The reason I believe this is important for Jews is because YHWH does state that BOTH Israel and Judah will be brought back from captivity. Thus, both Jews and the rest of Israel will have to repent in captivity in order to be brought out from captivity.
What will people of the Jewish religion have to repent of? Obeying what the Rabbis, sages, and oral traditions state, rather than strictly observing what The Holy Hebrew Scriptures state so plainly.
(Jer. 30:4-7 KJV) "Now these are the words that YHWH spoke concerning Israel and Judah, 'For thus says YHWH: ... Ask now, and see 'whether a man is ever in labor with child?' So why do I see every man with his hands on his loins like a woman in labor, and all faces turned pale? Alas! For that, day is great, so that none is like it; and it is the time of Jacob's trouble, But he shall be saved out of it.
Charles J Voss
www.uhcg.org
M E D I T A C I Ó N
Entiendo que estés disgustado con nosotros, los judíos, y sobre todo desde que tenemos nuestro propio Estado, con Israel. Y más aún, estimo que puedas estar enojado y hasta furioso
No es nada nuevo, porque es claro que
cada tanto pareces perturbado y disgustado con nosotros los judíos, estemos donde estemos y hagamos lo que hagamos.
Caro MUNDO, entendemos que nosotros, los Hebreos, y en especial los de Israel, te causamos menudos problemas porque irritamos a los árabes. Y éstos son tantos, unos 400 millones, y lo que es más importante, poseen tanto petróleo. Y nosotros, nada. Y que cuando hablas del mundo musulmán, has de tener en cuenta que deben ser algo más de 1.500 millones, un quinto de tu población, mientras que nosotros, los judíos, que no llegamos a los 14 millones, numéricamente somos algo insignificante. Tan sólo un 0,2% que es como decir casi nada. Y, claro, a los musulmanes en general y a los árabes en particular, hay que tenerlos gozosos y contentos, porque son un bloque tan importante y poderoso que mucho temes enojarlo con un proceder nada sensato.
Hoy te enoja la represión de los palestinos, aunque sea para buscar o castigar a terroristas. Antes, lo estabas por la destrucción del reactor nuclear del tirano y genocida Saddam Hussein en Bagdad, también te sentiste malhumorado por nuestra victoria en la Guerra de Yom Kipur.
Como bien lo sabes, todos fueron ataques defensivos. Israel es tan pequeño que no puede darse el lujo de perder una sola guerra; sería la última, sería su fin. Pero por algún motivo que desconozco, igual que ocurrió tantas veces, te sentiste irritado.
Aparentemente, los triunfos y la vida de los judíos te molestan enormemente. Como ya te comenté mucho antes de la existencia del Estado de Israel, el pueblo judío te ha disgustado.
Y podemos ir hacia atrás en un largo camino histórico de perturbaciones. Citaré tan sólo algunos casos.
Molestamos a los señores feudales del medioevo, que nos acusaban de ser los causantes de todas las pestes y calamidades que asolaban a sus pobres vasallos, aunque éramos totalmente inocentes.
E irritamos a los cruzados, que yendo a liberar Tierra Santa estaban tan disgustados con los judíos que asesinaron a cuantos pudieron en el camino a su santa cruzada.
Ya en el siglo XV molestamos a los reyes de España, que nos mataron por millares y nos obligaban a convertirnos a la fe "verdadera" so pena de morir en la hoguera; no contentos con eso nos expulsaron de todo su territorio. Y véase, hasta el día de hoy los descendientes de esos exiliados veneran el español y lo siguen hablando como si todavía fueran de allí.
Durante siglos perturbamos a la Iglesia Católica, que hizo lo posible para eliminarnos a través de la Inquisición. Todo por la santa fe. Nos acusaba de ritos bárbaros, y entre otras cosas, de ser el pueblo deicida.
También irritamos a Martín Lutero, quien en su llamado de quemar las sinagogas con los judíos dentro, mostró un admirable espíritu de misericordia cristiana.
Molestamos a todos los gobernantes de Europa, que nos acusaban de ser los causantes de todos los problemas, cada vez que se producía una crisis social o económica. Y así siguió ocurriendo durante siglos, a pesar de los nuestra contribución al progreso de la ciencia y la medicina.
Parece ser que hemos encolerizado al pueblo alemán que eligió a Hitler, y al austríaco que celebró su entrada en Viena. Dijeron que éramos la hez de la humanidad y que no teníamos derecho a la vida. También pareciera que molestábamos a las naciones eslavas, Polonia, Hungría, y a otras más, ya que todas ellas nos entregaron a los verdugos nazis para ser llevados a las cámaras de gas, como si no fuéramos sus ciudadanos.
Antes de esto habíamos fastidiado a los zares de Rusia y a los cosacos, que masacraron a miles de judíos a lo largo de una larga serie de pogroms para limpiar el país de elementos tan perniciosos.
También conseguimos alterar a Stalin, ya que en sus purgas y en sus gulags se deshizo de varios miles de nosotros, con los más variados argumentos.
Y al llegar al extremo de sentirnos molestos por disgustarte, querido MUNDO, es que decidimos dejarte (en un modo de decir) y establecer un Estado Judío.
La razón es que al vivir en diferentes latitudes y países, sentimos que te irritábamos y perturbábamos, aún cuando algunos abandonaban nuestra cultura y nuestras tradiciones asimilándose a las de la mayoría.
Los judíos que se convertían a la "fe verdadera", antes y después del decreto de expulsión de 1492, los conversos, no dejaron de ser objeto de discriminació n, maltrato, ataques y asesinatos.
También las cámaras de gas estuvieron llenas de alemanes que se creían libres de su judaísmo, y se dieron cuenta que se equivocaron mientras se les llevaban como ganado en los trenes a los campos de exterminio.
Por todo eso decidimos volver a construir un Estado en el mismo sitio donde la mayoría fuimos expulsados hace dos milenios por el Imperio Romano, al cual también habíamos disgustado. En especial, por no adorar a sus dioses e insistir en uno solo.
Mientras tanto te hemos dado hombres extraordinarios, filósofos, artistas, científicos. Muchos de ellos, con sus investigaciones o con sus trabajos marcaron hitos en la historia universal. Ya sabes: Maimónides, Baruch Spinosa, Henrich Heine, Franz Kafka, Gustav Mahler, Marcel Proust, Albert Einstein, Serge Einsestein, Sigmund Freud, Amedeo Modigliani, Carl Marx, Albert Sabin, César Milstein, George Gershwin, C. Levi-Strauss, Norman Mailer, Alexander Fleming, Martin Buber, Shmuel Agnon, Danny Kaye, Steven Spielberg, Barbara Streisand y muchos más. Todos ellos aportaron tanto a la humanidad, del insignificante 0,2% que somos de tu población, te hemos dado más del 20% de los laureados con el Premio Nóbel. Cuando estalló la Guerra Civil Española, acudieron de todo el mundo 40.000 hombres para luchar contra el fascismo en las Brigadas, y de ellos 7.000 eran judíos, una proporción realmente impresionante.
Aparentemente, querido MUNDO, tú eres muy difícil de complacer. Después de haber pasado por múltiples persecuciones y matanzas, por la Inquisición, los pogroms, el Holocausto y habiendo decidido vivir en nuestro pequeño Estado (algo así como la superficie de la provincia de Badajoz, la de Tucumán o el Estado de Nueva Jersey) parece que seguimos irritándote.
Tú estás disgustado por nuestro operativo contra los palestinos.. . y hasta les disculpas sus terribles asesinatos con suicidas o que sacrifiquen a sus pobres niños colocándolos en las líneas de fuego.
Nunca antes te habías mostrado tan indulgente ni interesado por la suerte de nadie como por la de ellos, aún cuando los árabes de Sudán hayan matado a más de 800.000 personas en el proceso de islamización de ese país, o cuando los habitantes de Timor Este morían como moscas. Tampoco te sentiste interesado cuando los franceses masacraban a la resistencia en Argelia. O te has inquietado por los niños de Sierra Leona que mueren matando todos los días. O por los cientos de miles de victimas en Camboya. A ti, mundo, nada parece interesarte que no tengan Estados propios los tamiles, los corsos, los kurdos, los canacas de Nueva Caledonia, los igbos (o ibos), los aymaras, los saharauis, los sioux o los gitanos (y hay otros más).
De los cientos de naciones sin Estado, sólo los palestinos han despertado tu solidaridad incondicional. Nadie mueve un dedo por los miles de pueblos sin Estado en todo el mundo. Pueblos que ahora son aniquilados, asesinados, como el kurdo, los negros de Darfur en el sur de Sudán o los pobres habitantes del Congo. Es estos casos casi no dices esta boca es mía.
Pero los palestinos te interesan ahora, aunque cuando Jordania mató a miles de ellos en el Septiembre Negro, tampoco dijiste gran cosa (y ésta es historia nueva).
Y cuando Kuwait expulsó a cien mil palestinos de su país, tampoco nadie lo comentó. ¿Por qué esta solidaridad con el pueblo palestino cuando se enfrenta a Israel?
Nunca TÚ, querido MUNDO, has estado tan solidario como con los palestinos, aún cuando estaban encabezados por un terrorista tan corrupto como él, que dirigió una de las administraciones más corruptas, capaz de desviar para cuentas particulares, los fondos con que TÚ le ayudas generosamente.
¿Por qué, querido MUNDO, te inventas masacres donde hubo combates, como en Jenín? A qué se debe que tus prestigiosos intelectuales comparan el genocidio de millones de personas indefensas y ciudadanos pacíficos durante el Holocausto, con enfrentamientos en un levantamiento armado que en dos años ha causado más de 1.000 victimas israelíes. Has aceptado una comparación de lo incomparable.
Apenas has dicho algo cuando dinamitaron en Argentina la Embajada de Israel, o la sede de AMIA causando más de cien víctimas, o cuando en Francia destrozan sinagogas, agreden a colegiales o profanan los cementerios judíos.
O cuando medio centenar de personas son vilmente asesinadas en un hotel de Netania, en una de nuestras celebraciones más solemnes. O cuando destrozan a escolares y amas de casa en los autobuses y mercados de Israel.
Tú estás muy enojado porque no renunciamos a las tierras ganadas en 1967, a las que llegamos venciendo con nuestra sangre a la agresión de todo el mundo árabe. Moscú, Washington, Europa, los árabes moderados y los radicales, todos molestos con nuestra victoria.
Bueno, querido MUNDO, ponte por un momento en la piel de un judío común y corriente de Israel y dime como te sentirías.
Entre 1920-29 no existía ese problema de territorios ocupados de 1967 que impidieran la paz entre judíos y árabes, no había Estado Judío para molestar a nadie. Pero ello no obstante estos mismos palestinos asesinaron a cientos de judíos en Jerusalén, Jaffa, Safed y Hebrón. En especial en esta última ciudad, en 1929, pasaron a cuchillo en un solo día a 67 judíos.
¿Acaso pudo haberse debido su furia por la "agresión israelí" de 1967? ¿Y por qué 510 judíos, hombres, mujeres y niños fueron asesinados en disturbios provocados por los árabes entre 1936-39? ¿Fue porque los árabes se sintieron molestos por lo de 1967? No es lógico, ¿verdad?
Y cuando tú, MUNDO, propusiste un plan de partición en 1947, que hubiera dado lugar a dos Estados, uno árabe y otro judío, los árabes respondieron con un rotundo ¡no!, fueron a la guerra y mataron a 6.000 judíos. ¿Por qué? ¿Porque tal vez preveían los acontecimientos de 1967? ¿O era para aniquilar a todos los judíos?
En verdad, MUNDO, ¿por qué no se ha formulado tu queja, tu molestia en aquel momento? Los pobres palestinos, que nunca hasta la creación del Estado de Israel se habían identificado como tales, que jamás pretendieron tener un Estado hasta esa fecha, son los mismos que hoy matan judíos con explosivos, integran a ese mismo pueblo que incita a arrojarnos al mar.
El mismo odio, la misma falsedad, el mismo grito de “¡itbaj-el-yahud!” (¡Masacrar a los judíos!) que oímos hoy, fueron escuchados entonces. El mismo pueblo, el mismo sueño: destruir Israel. Querido MUNDO, tú estuviste pasivo, no dijiste nada, permaneciste a la espera, en 1948, cuando seis países lanzaron una guerra que la Liga Árabe orgullosa y creída de su posible victoria, comparó con las masacres de los mongoles.
También te cruzaste de brazos en 1967, cuando un Nasser eufórico y militante instó al mundo árabe a arrojarnos al mar. Y solamente despertaste de tu insomnio cuando se quedó con un ejército destrozado por completo.
Te seguimos molestando, querido MUNDO, por protestar contra
todas aquellas persecuciones, vejaciones y matanzas, todo aquel viejo
antisemitismo, que toma hoy la forma de antisionismo, y que reemplaza a la misma judeofobia de siempre.
Tú, querido MUNDO, estarás encogido de hombros o tal vez a la espera, cuando mañana Israel enfrente su posible extinción otra vez. Pero no lo dudes, haremos todo lo posible para permanecer vivos en nuestra propia tierra, haciendo lo que haga falta para ello.
Si esto te molesta, MUNDO, piensa cuántas veces en el pasado tú nos has disgustado y perturbado. Ahora estamos bien amoscados y resentidos al ver cómo tergiversas los sucesos, adulteras los hechos y falsificas las situaciones. No está nada bien que te portes de ese modo.
Pensándolo bien, ¿sabes una cosa MUNDO?: a pesar de todo, aquí, en Israel, hay un judío; no, me equivoco, hay muchos judíos, a quienes no les importa un bledo que te sientas tan molesto.
Moshé Yanai
No es nada nuevo, porque es claro que
cada tanto pareces perturbado y disgustado con nosotros los judíos, estemos donde estemos y hagamos lo que hagamos.
Caro MUNDO, entendemos que nosotros, los Hebreos, y en especial los de Israel, te causamos menudos problemas porque irritamos a los árabes. Y éstos son tantos, unos 400 millones, y lo que es más importante, poseen tanto petróleo. Y nosotros, nada. Y que cuando hablas del mundo musulmán, has de tener en cuenta que deben ser algo más de 1.500 millones, un quinto de tu población, mientras que nosotros, los judíos, que no llegamos a los 14 millones, numéricamente somos algo insignificante. Tan sólo un 0,2% que es como decir casi nada. Y, claro, a los musulmanes en general y a los árabes en particular, hay que tenerlos gozosos y contentos, porque son un bloque tan importante y poderoso que mucho temes enojarlo con un proceder nada sensato.
Hoy te enoja la represión de los palestinos, aunque sea para buscar o castigar a terroristas. Antes, lo estabas por la destrucción del reactor nuclear del tirano y genocida Saddam Hussein en Bagdad, también te sentiste malhumorado por nuestra victoria en la Guerra de Yom Kipur.
Como bien lo sabes, todos fueron ataques defensivos. Israel es tan pequeño que no puede darse el lujo de perder una sola guerra; sería la última, sería su fin. Pero por algún motivo que desconozco, igual que ocurrió tantas veces, te sentiste irritado.
Aparentemente, los triunfos y la vida de los judíos te molestan enormemente. Como ya te comenté mucho antes de la existencia del Estado de Israel, el pueblo judío te ha disgustado.
Y podemos ir hacia atrás en un largo camino histórico de perturbaciones. Citaré tan sólo algunos casos.
Molestamos a los señores feudales del medioevo, que nos acusaban de ser los causantes de todas las pestes y calamidades que asolaban a sus pobres vasallos, aunque éramos totalmente inocentes.
E irritamos a los cruzados, que yendo a liberar Tierra Santa estaban tan disgustados con los judíos que asesinaron a cuantos pudieron en el camino a su santa cruzada.
Ya en el siglo XV molestamos a los reyes de España, que nos mataron por millares y nos obligaban a convertirnos a la fe "verdadera" so pena de morir en la hoguera; no contentos con eso nos expulsaron de todo su territorio. Y véase, hasta el día de hoy los descendientes de esos exiliados veneran el español y lo siguen hablando como si todavía fueran de allí.
Durante siglos perturbamos a la Iglesia Católica, que hizo lo posible para eliminarnos a través de la Inquisición. Todo por la santa fe. Nos acusaba de ritos bárbaros, y entre otras cosas, de ser el pueblo deicida.
También irritamos a Martín Lutero, quien en su llamado de quemar las sinagogas con los judíos dentro, mostró un admirable espíritu de misericordia cristiana.
Molestamos a todos los gobernantes de Europa, que nos acusaban de ser los causantes de todos los problemas, cada vez que se producía una crisis social o económica. Y así siguió ocurriendo durante siglos, a pesar de los nuestra contribución al progreso de la ciencia y la medicina.
Parece ser que hemos encolerizado al pueblo alemán que eligió a Hitler, y al austríaco que celebró su entrada en Viena. Dijeron que éramos la hez de la humanidad y que no teníamos derecho a la vida. También pareciera que molestábamos a las naciones eslavas, Polonia, Hungría, y a otras más, ya que todas ellas nos entregaron a los verdugos nazis para ser llevados a las cámaras de gas, como si no fuéramos sus ciudadanos.
Antes de esto habíamos fastidiado a los zares de Rusia y a los cosacos, que masacraron a miles de judíos a lo largo de una larga serie de pogroms para limpiar el país de elementos tan perniciosos.
También conseguimos alterar a Stalin, ya que en sus purgas y en sus gulags se deshizo de varios miles de nosotros, con los más variados argumentos.
Y al llegar al extremo de sentirnos molestos por disgustarte, querido MUNDO, es que decidimos dejarte (en un modo de decir) y establecer un Estado Judío.
La razón es que al vivir en diferentes latitudes y países, sentimos que te irritábamos y perturbábamos, aún cuando algunos abandonaban nuestra cultura y nuestras tradiciones asimilándose a las de la mayoría.
Los judíos que se convertían a la "fe verdadera", antes y después del decreto de expulsión de 1492, los conversos, no dejaron de ser objeto de discriminació n, maltrato, ataques y asesinatos.
También las cámaras de gas estuvieron llenas de alemanes que se creían libres de su judaísmo, y se dieron cuenta que se equivocaron mientras se les llevaban como ganado en los trenes a los campos de exterminio.
Por todo eso decidimos volver a construir un Estado en el mismo sitio donde la mayoría fuimos expulsados hace dos milenios por el Imperio Romano, al cual también habíamos disgustado. En especial, por no adorar a sus dioses e insistir en uno solo.
Mientras tanto te hemos dado hombres extraordinarios, filósofos, artistas, científicos. Muchos de ellos, con sus investigaciones o con sus trabajos marcaron hitos en la historia universal. Ya sabes: Maimónides, Baruch Spinosa, Henrich Heine, Franz Kafka, Gustav Mahler, Marcel Proust, Albert Einstein, Serge Einsestein, Sigmund Freud, Amedeo Modigliani, Carl Marx, Albert Sabin, César Milstein, George Gershwin, C. Levi-Strauss, Norman Mailer, Alexander Fleming, Martin Buber, Shmuel Agnon, Danny Kaye, Steven Spielberg, Barbara Streisand y muchos más. Todos ellos aportaron tanto a la humanidad, del insignificante 0,2% que somos de tu población, te hemos dado más del 20% de los laureados con el Premio Nóbel. Cuando estalló la Guerra Civil Española, acudieron de todo el mundo 40.000 hombres para luchar contra el fascismo en las Brigadas, y de ellos 7.000 eran judíos, una proporción realmente impresionante.
Aparentemente, querido MUNDO, tú eres muy difícil de complacer. Después de haber pasado por múltiples persecuciones y matanzas, por la Inquisición, los pogroms, el Holocausto y habiendo decidido vivir en nuestro pequeño Estado (algo así como la superficie de la provincia de Badajoz, la de Tucumán o el Estado de Nueva Jersey) parece que seguimos irritándote.
Tú estás disgustado por nuestro operativo contra los palestinos.. . y hasta les disculpas sus terribles asesinatos con suicidas o que sacrifiquen a sus pobres niños colocándolos en las líneas de fuego.
Nunca antes te habías mostrado tan indulgente ni interesado por la suerte de nadie como por la de ellos, aún cuando los árabes de Sudán hayan matado a más de 800.000 personas en el proceso de islamización de ese país, o cuando los habitantes de Timor Este morían como moscas. Tampoco te sentiste interesado cuando los franceses masacraban a la resistencia en Argelia. O te has inquietado por los niños de Sierra Leona que mueren matando todos los días. O por los cientos de miles de victimas en Camboya. A ti, mundo, nada parece interesarte que no tengan Estados propios los tamiles, los corsos, los kurdos, los canacas de Nueva Caledonia, los igbos (o ibos), los aymaras, los saharauis, los sioux o los gitanos (y hay otros más).
De los cientos de naciones sin Estado, sólo los palestinos han despertado tu solidaridad incondicional. Nadie mueve un dedo por los miles de pueblos sin Estado en todo el mundo. Pueblos que ahora son aniquilados, asesinados, como el kurdo, los negros de Darfur en el sur de Sudán o los pobres habitantes del Congo. Es estos casos casi no dices esta boca es mía.
Pero los palestinos te interesan ahora, aunque cuando Jordania mató a miles de ellos en el Septiembre Negro, tampoco dijiste gran cosa (y ésta es historia nueva).
Y cuando Kuwait expulsó a cien mil palestinos de su país, tampoco nadie lo comentó. ¿Por qué esta solidaridad con el pueblo palestino cuando se enfrenta a Israel?
Nunca TÚ, querido MUNDO, has estado tan solidario como con los palestinos, aún cuando estaban encabezados por un terrorista tan corrupto como él, que dirigió una de las administraciones más corruptas, capaz de desviar para cuentas particulares, los fondos con que TÚ le ayudas generosamente.
¿Por qué, querido MUNDO, te inventas masacres donde hubo combates, como en Jenín? A qué se debe que tus prestigiosos intelectuales comparan el genocidio de millones de personas indefensas y ciudadanos pacíficos durante el Holocausto, con enfrentamientos en un levantamiento armado que en dos años ha causado más de 1.000 victimas israelíes. Has aceptado una comparación de lo incomparable.
Apenas has dicho algo cuando dinamitaron en Argentina la Embajada de Israel, o la sede de AMIA causando más de cien víctimas, o cuando en Francia destrozan sinagogas, agreden a colegiales o profanan los cementerios judíos.
O cuando medio centenar de personas son vilmente asesinadas en un hotel de Netania, en una de nuestras celebraciones más solemnes. O cuando destrozan a escolares y amas de casa en los autobuses y mercados de Israel.
Tú estás muy enojado porque no renunciamos a las tierras ganadas en 1967, a las que llegamos venciendo con nuestra sangre a la agresión de todo el mundo árabe. Moscú, Washington, Europa, los árabes moderados y los radicales, todos molestos con nuestra victoria.
Bueno, querido MUNDO, ponte por un momento en la piel de un judío común y corriente de Israel y dime como te sentirías.
Entre 1920-29 no existía ese problema de territorios ocupados de 1967 que impidieran la paz entre judíos y árabes, no había Estado Judío para molestar a nadie. Pero ello no obstante estos mismos palestinos asesinaron a cientos de judíos en Jerusalén, Jaffa, Safed y Hebrón. En especial en esta última ciudad, en 1929, pasaron a cuchillo en un solo día a 67 judíos.
¿Acaso pudo haberse debido su furia por la "agresión israelí" de 1967? ¿Y por qué 510 judíos, hombres, mujeres y niños fueron asesinados en disturbios provocados por los árabes entre 1936-39? ¿Fue porque los árabes se sintieron molestos por lo de 1967? No es lógico, ¿verdad?
Y cuando tú, MUNDO, propusiste un plan de partición en 1947, que hubiera dado lugar a dos Estados, uno árabe y otro judío, los árabes respondieron con un rotundo ¡no!, fueron a la guerra y mataron a 6.000 judíos. ¿Por qué? ¿Porque tal vez preveían los acontecimientos de 1967? ¿O era para aniquilar a todos los judíos?
En verdad, MUNDO, ¿por qué no se ha formulado tu queja, tu molestia en aquel momento? Los pobres palestinos, que nunca hasta la creación del Estado de Israel se habían identificado como tales, que jamás pretendieron tener un Estado hasta esa fecha, son los mismos que hoy matan judíos con explosivos, integran a ese mismo pueblo que incita a arrojarnos al mar.
El mismo odio, la misma falsedad, el mismo grito de “¡itbaj-el-yahud!” (¡Masacrar a los judíos!) que oímos hoy, fueron escuchados entonces. El mismo pueblo, el mismo sueño: destruir Israel. Querido MUNDO, tú estuviste pasivo, no dijiste nada, permaneciste a la espera, en 1948, cuando seis países lanzaron una guerra que la Liga Árabe orgullosa y creída de su posible victoria, comparó con las masacres de los mongoles.
También te cruzaste de brazos en 1967, cuando un Nasser eufórico y militante instó al mundo árabe a arrojarnos al mar. Y solamente despertaste de tu insomnio cuando se quedó con un ejército destrozado por completo.
Te seguimos molestando, querido MUNDO, por protestar contra
todas aquellas persecuciones, vejaciones y matanzas, todo aquel viejo
antisemitismo, que toma hoy la forma de antisionismo, y que reemplaza a la misma judeofobia de siempre.
Tú, querido MUNDO, estarás encogido de hombros o tal vez a la espera, cuando mañana Israel enfrente su posible extinción otra vez. Pero no lo dudes, haremos todo lo posible para permanecer vivos en nuestra propia tierra, haciendo lo que haga falta para ello.
Si esto te molesta, MUNDO, piensa cuántas veces en el pasado tú nos has disgustado y perturbado. Ahora estamos bien amoscados y resentidos al ver cómo tergiversas los sucesos, adulteras los hechos y falsificas las situaciones. No está nada bien que te portes de ese modo.
Pensándolo bien, ¿sabes una cosa MUNDO?: a pesar de todo, aquí, en Israel, hay un judío; no, me equivoco, hay muchos judíos, a quienes no les importa un bledo que te sientas tan molesto.
Moshé Yanai
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)