roblesolarte

C Á P S U L A S 100



Por: J. N. Robles Olarte


Celibacy's Roots and Fruits


One must understand that mandatory celibacy is not taught in the Bible, nor was it practiced by the apostles. This teaching developed as an integral part of the evolving papal system and gradually became essential to it. The concern was not morality, for celibacy proved to be a veritable cornucopia of evil. In fact, the rule of celibacy was not the prohibition of sex but of marriage. Pope Alexander 11 (1061-73), for example, refused to discipline a priest who had committed adultery with his father's second wife because he hadn't committed the sin of matrimony. That was the great evil which had to be eliminated for the priesthood to be totally devoted to the Church.
All down through history not only priests and prelates but popes as well had their mistresses and visited prostitutes. Many were homosexuals. No member of the clergy was ever excommunicated for having sex, but thousands have been put out of the priesthood for the scandal of getting married. Why then the strict insistence upon celibacy, even to the present day, if it really doesn't mean abstinence from sex? It is because the rule of celibacy has a very practical and lucrative result for the Church: It leaves priests and especially bishops and popes without families to whom to bequeath property and thereby impoverish the Church. The clergy must have no heirs.
Pope Gregory VII, bemoaning the difficulty in stamping out marriage among priests, declared: "The Church cannot escape from the clutches of the laity unless priests first escape from the clutches of their wives." Here is another vital reason for celibacy: to create a priesthood without the encumbrance (and loving loyalties) of wives and children. Thus fornication and adultery, though forbidden in theory, were preferable to a marriage relationship. Nineteenth-century historian R.W. Thompson explains:
It was considered absolutely necessary to the perfect working of the papal system that there should be organized a compact body of ecclesiastics, destitute of all those generous sympathies which grow alone out of the family relation, that they might be the better fitted to do the work of the popes....4
Though married men in those early days were allowed to enter the priesthood, they were required to live celibate lives. Pope Leo I (440-61) decreed that married clergy were to treat their wives "as sisters." Few if any Catholics realize that as late as the reign of Pope Gregory VII (1073-85) it was accepted for priests to be married and supposedly live in celibacy with their wives.
Such a requirement was both unnatural and unrealistic. Who could keep such a rule? All over Italy the clerics openly had large families and no discipline was enacted against them. After all,
many of the popes had large families as well and sometimes made no secret of it. De Rosa comments:
This theological confusion in an age of depravity led the clergy, in fifth-century Rome in particular, to become a byword for everything that was gross and perverted.... When Pope Sixtus 111(432-40) was put on trial for seducing a nun, he ably defended himself by quoting Christ's words, "Let him who is without fault among you throw the first stone."
... roving monks were proving to be a social menace ... there were long periods when many monasteries were nothing but houses of ill repute.... The second Council of Tours in the year 567 ... publicly admitted there was hardly a cleric anywhere without his wife or mistress.... 5
A System Made for Prostitution
For centuries the priesthood was largely hereditary. Most priests were the sons of other priests and bishops. More than one pope was the illegitimate son of a previous and supposedly celibate pope. For example, Pope Sylverius (536-7) was fathered by Pope Hormisdas (514-23), and John XI (931-5) by Sergius III (904-11) of his favorite mistress, Marozia, to whom we referred earlier.
Among the other bastards who ruled the Church were Popes Boniface 1(418-22), Gelasius (492-6), Agapitus (535-6), and Theodore (642-9). There were more. Adrian IV (1154-9) was the son of a priest. No wonder Pope Pius 11 (1458-64) said Rome was "the only city run by bastards." Pius himself admitted to fathering at least two illegitimate children, by different women, one of them married at the time. The rule of celibacy literally created prostitutes, making Rome the "Mother of Harlots," as the apostle John foresaw.
In his fiery sermons, Savonarola of Florence, Italy (soon to be martyred), called Rome "a harlot ready to sell her favors for coin"6 and accused the priests of bringing "spiritual death upon all ... their piety consists in spending their nights with harlots." He cried, "One thousand, ten thousand, fourteen thousand harlots are few for Rome, for there both men and women are made harlots."7
Pope Alexander VI threatened to "lay an interdict upon Florence" if it did not silence Savonarola. The city rulers obeyed for fear that as a result of the interdict all "the Florentine merchants in Rome would be thrown into jail."8 The pope wanted Savonarola brought to Rome for trial as a heretic, but the Signory of Florence wanted to execute him themselves. After signing confessions that had been wrung out of them by the cruelest of torture, Savonarola and two comrade friars were hanged and burned to ashes.9 Yet this man who preached against the Church leaders' immorality and was slain by Roman Catholics is now celebrated by the Vatican as "a giant of our faith, martyred May 23, 1498."10 What revision of history!
Visiting Germany in the eighth century, St. Boniface found that none of the clergy honored their vows of celibacy. He wrote to Pope Zachary (741-52): "Young men who spent their youth in rape and adultery were rising in the ranks of the clergy. They were spending their nights in bed with four or five women, then getting up in the morning ... to celebrate mass." Bishop Rathurio complained that if he excommunicated unchaste priests "there would be none left to administer the sacraments, except boys. If he excluded bastards, as canon law demanded, not even boys [would be left]."11
Even idealists became unprincipled rogues because the priesthood was one of the surest and fastest ways to wealth and power and afforded unique opportunities for the most profligate
pleasure. Today's pope, John Paul II, in his recent encyclical, Veritatis Splendor (Splendor of Truth), soundly condemns promiscuity. One might respect such a treatise if he would admit that his predecessors in the papacy have been some of the worst offenders; that the clergy, because they can't marry, have been more prone to illicit relationships than the laity; and that promiscuity is still widespread among the Roman Catholic clergy. Otherwise Splendor of Truth has a hollow sound.
(Fopuntin: A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST, by Dave Hunt, Chap. 12)



The Vatican, the Nazis
And the Jews


Hitler's intention to exterminate the Jews was known by the Vatican before it signed the concordat, yet the Holocaust never became a factor in the Church's subsequent dealings with the Fuehrer. On April 1, 1933, about four months before the Vatican would sign its concordat with him, Hitler began his systematic program with a boycott against the Jews. He justified it with these words: "I believe that I act today in unison with the Almighty Creator's intention. By fighting the Jews I do battle for the Lord." When the Italian ambassador, speaking for Mussolini, asked Hitler to reconsider his harsh attitude toward the Jews, Hitler "predicted `with absolute certainty' that in five or six hundred years the name of Hitler would be honored in all lands `as the man who once and for all exterminated the Jewish pest from the world."
Hitler had the backing of many German psychiatrists who would later declare that Himmler, Hoess, and the other Nazi mass murderers were quite "normal." As for the German psychiatrists' feelings about the Jews, Carl Jung expressed the view of many when, as president of the New German Society of Psychotherapy, he wrote:
The Arian unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish.... Freud [a Jew] ... knew the German soul as little as his idolators knew it. Did they learn something from the powerful appearance of National Socialism upon which the world looks with amazed eyes ...?
SS Lieutenant Colonel Adolph Eichmann's role as director of the extermination of Jews from all over Nazi-occupied Europe was just a job and had nothing to do with God or religion. Unlike Catholics, he had no quarrel with Jews. Even Simon Wiesenthal, who devoted his life to tracking down Nazi war criminals, said that Eichmann had "no motive, no hatred [against Jews in particular].... He would have done the same job if he had been ordered to kill all men whose name began with P or B, or all who had red hair."
For Hitler, however, the Holocaust was a highly spiritual undertaking. In line with his conviction that he was doing God's will in exterminating the Jews, Hitler ordered that the Final Solution be executed "as humanely as possible." In spite of his persecution of the Church whenever he perceived that it stood in his way, Hitler insisted to the very end, "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." He was convinced that the plan he had conceived as a good Catholic would complete the massacre of "those Christ killers" which the Catholic Church had begun during the Middle Ages but had executed so poorly. John Toland explains:
The extermination, therefore, could be done without a twinge of conscience since he was merely acting as the avenging hand of God-so long as it was done impersonally, without cruelty. Himmler was pleased to murder with mercy. He ordered technical experts to
devise gas chambers which would eliminate masses of Jews efficiently and "humanely," then crowded the victims into boxcars and sent them east to stay in ghettos until the killing centers in Poland were completed.
Church Support of Nazi Anti-Semitism
Hermann Goering and Franz von Papen on their mission to work out a concordat were well-received at the Vatican. Rome's friendly attitude toward the Nazi regime was made clear. Had no one read Mein Kampf? Of course they had, but Rome and Berlin had much in common, including persecution and killing of Jews. There was no lack of Catholic leaders who openly supported the purge of Jews. During the years 1933-39, the writings of leading Catholics, "all published in journals edited by priests or in books bearing the Imprimatur" presented ideas such as the following:
The Jews had a "demoralizing influence on religiosity and national character." [They] had brought the German people "more damage than benefit." The Jews had displayed "a mortal hatred for Jesus, while the Aryan Pontius Pilate would gladly have let him go free." ... The Jews. .. "in their boundless hatred of Christianity were still in the forefront of those seeking to destroy the Church."7
Curate Roth, who became an official in the Nazi Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs, called the Jews "a morally inferior race who would have to be eliminated from public life." Dr. Haeuser, in a book with the Imprimatur of the diocese of Regensburg, called the Jews "Germany's cross, a people disowned by God and under their own curse [who] carried much of the blame for Germany having lost the [First World] War...." Father Senn called Hitler "the tool of God, called upon to overcome Judaism." Nazism, he said, provided "the last big opportunity to throw off the Jewish Yoke."8
The Church cooperated fully with the Nazis "in sorting out people of Jewish descent...." A priest wrote in the Klerusblatt, "We shall do our best to help in this service to the people." The Church continued this diabolical "cooperation" all through the war, even when being Jewish meant "deportation and outright physical destruction." The Church was well aware of the Jews' dread fate. In a speech on January 30, 1939, only months before his attack upon Poland began the war, Hitler had declared that if war broke out it would result in "the extermination of the Jewish race."
Hitler's totalitarianism was approved by the Church so long as it could be his partner. Guenter Lewy's extensive sifting through the relevant documents of the entire Nazi period indicates that "the Holy See was no more opposed to the central political doctrines of Nazism than the German bishops themselves." Cardinal Faulhaber "went out of his way to make clear that he was not concerned with defending his Jewish contemporaries." One had to distinguish, he said, between the Jews before the crucifixion of Christ and afterward. In 1939, Archbishop Grober declared that -
Jesus Christ. .. had been fundamentally different from the Jews of his time-so much so that they had hated him and demanded his crucifixion, and "their murderous hatred has continued in later centuries."
Jesus had been a Jew, admitted Bishop Hilfrich of Limburg... in 1939, but "the Christian religion has ... had to make its way against this people."
Theologian Karl Adam defended the preservation of the German people's pure blood as a justified act of selfdefense, for. .. "the myth of the German, his culture and his history are decisively shaped by blood."
An article on the revolution of 1918 in the paper of the Bavarian priests exposed the role of the Jews in this stab in the back of the undefeated German army [and on and on it went in similar vein].
Cardinal Bertram, head of the East German church province, and Archbishop Grober, head of the Upper Rhenish province, along with other bishops, expressed concern for the dismissals of Catholic civil servants by the new government. At the same time, however, the bishops rejected reports of brutality in the new concentration camps. Grober even became a "promoting member" of the SS and kept up his financial contributions to the bitter end.
What the Vatican and German Bishops Knew
Nazism was opposed by Catholic leaders only where it conflicted with "Church matters and interests." Thus while remaining silent regarding the Holocaust as a whole, the Church spoke up for and attempted to protect Jewish converts to Catholicism. That fact makes its failure to oppose the Nazi extermination of Jews all the more reprehensible. "There were 30 million Catholics in Germany. Although Jews were helped secretly [by some Catholic individuals], the Church never publicly recognized that the defense of the Jews was a Christian duty." The Vatican sternly banned other books, but it never put Mein Kampf or the poisonous anti-Semitic works of numerous Church leaders on its Index of forbidden reading. Joseph Muller, a military intelligence officer and confidant of Cardinal Faulhaber, "kept the episcopate well informed about the systematic atrocities committed in Poland." So did Hans Globke, a Catholic high official in the Ministry of the Interior "entrusted with handling racial matters." The Vatican and the German bishops, along with most of the German population, knew full well that Jews were being rounded up and exterminated. Viereck reminds us:
Hitler's extermination-expert, R[udolf] Hoess, wrote in Commandant ofAuschwitz: "When a strong wind was blowing, the stench of burning flesh was carried for many miles and caused the whole neighborhood to talk about the burning of the Jews." He notes, of still another camp, that whenever a bus with victims drove past, even the German children chortled in the street: "There comes the murder box again!" The Church well knew what was happening but closed its eyes as well as its lips. Kurt Gerstein, a covert member of the evangelical opposition to Hitler, became an SS officer in order to discover the secret of the extermination camps and tell it to the world. He brought his report to the pope's personal representative in Berlin, who refused to see him when he explained his errand.
"There were tens of thousands of priests in cities, towns, and villages throughout Europe. They saw houses emptied, villagers deported; they heard confessions. They were unusually well informed." Catholic soldiers returned periodically from the Russian front with tales of the wholesale massacres. "The Vatican was among the first to know of the genocidal programs.
Authoritative information on the killing was sent to the Vatican by its own diplomats in March 1942." Hitler flaunted his evil intentions and deeds to the world. The Vatican had no excuse for its Nazi partnership or for its continued commendation of Hitler on the one hand and its thunderous silence regarding the Jewish question on the other hand. As the evil mounted, the Roman Catholic Church continued to work with the Fuehrer and even to praise him. Even after Hitler's troops, in spite of promises to the contrary, marched in and took over the demilitarized Rhineland, Catholic leaders all over Germany lauded him, among them Cardinal Schulte in Cologne's cathedral.
The concordat with Hitler was nothing new. The popes had been partners with evil rulers for centuries. Would Jesus make a deal with Pilate or the apostle Peter with Nero? Yet those who claimed to be Peter's successors had been in unholy alliances with pagan emperors from Constantine onward, and continued in the alliance with Hitler until the end of the war, reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in payments from the Nazi government to the Vatican.
The Moral Failure of Silence
Pius XII was known for his outspoken warnings to the faithful against the "abuse of human rights," yet he was silent about the Holocaust. He never spoke a public word against Hitler's systematic extermination of the Jews, because to do so would have condemned his own Church for its similar deeds. This silence, historians agree, encouraged Hitler and added to the unspeakable genocide.
The pope boasted that he was the moral watchdog for the world, yet said nothing in the face of the worst crime in human history. In his first encyclical, issued in October 1939, Pius XII declared that his office as Christ's vicar demanded that he "testify to the truth with Apostolic firmness." He went on to explain:
This duty necessarily entails the exposition and confutation of errors and human faults; for these must be made known before it is possible to tend and to heal them....
In the fulfillment of this our duty we shall not let ourselves be influenced by earthly considerations nor be held back by mistrust or opposition, by rebuffs or lack of appreciation of our words, nor yet by the fear of misconceptions and misinterpretations.
These were high-sounding words, but proved to be absolutely empty. The very day Pius XII commenced his pontificate, Mussolini expelled Italy's 69,000 Jews and the pope said nothing. A few weeks later Italy invaded Albania. The pope protested, but "not because a country had been wantonly attacked, but because the aggression had been carried out on a Good Friday. This was Christ's "vicar"?
Like their pope, the German bishops repeatedly promised "fearlessly to condemn injustice." In 1936 Cardinal Faulhaber declared that a bishop could not be God's servant "if he were to speak to please men or remain silent out of fear of men." In July 1941, Bishop Galen claimed to be the defender of every man's God-given "basic rights and liberties" and that his duty was to "courageously ... brand as an injustice crying to heaven the condemnation of defenseless innocents." Similar empty rhetoric was thundered from pulpits by other bishops, all of whom remained silent while 6 million Jews were systematically exterminated like so much vermin. The continued hypocrisy more than proves this is not the true Church.
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, now in his third five-year term as head of the modern equivalent of the Holy Inquisition, served in the military in Germany during the war, though he saw no combat. By his own admission he was aware of the Holocaust. No German could have been totally ignorant. "The abyss of Hitlerism could not be overlooked," Ratzinger now confesses.22 Yet he overlooked it when it would have cost him something to speak out against it.
Surely now, as the watchdog of orthodoxy and the longest serving and most powerful official in the Vatican next to the pope, Ratzinger could make amends both for his own silence and that of his Church all during the Holocaust. Why not offer genuine repentance and sorrowful apology to the Jews? But Ratzinger and John Paul II continue Pius XII's stony silence. And how could they apologize without admitting that their popes and Church have sinned grievously against Christ's natural brethren, and thus that the very claim to infallibility and being the one true Church is a fraud? (Fountain: A WOMANA RIDES THE BEAST, by Dave Hunt, Chap. 19)





What About Mary?

We have identified the woman astride the beast as Vatican City and the false World Church which will eventually be headquartered there. But why a woman on the beast and not a man? Why is this false World Church seen as a woman? Again this criterion, like all of the others in Revelation 17, fits the Vatican perfectly. The most prominent figure by far in Roman Catholicism is a woman. She overshadows all else, including even God Himself. More prayers are offered to the Catholic Mary and more attention and honor is given to her than to Christ and God combined. There are thousands of shrines to Mary around the world (and hundreds of shrines to other "saints"), but scarcely more than a handful of minor shrines to Christ himself.
Some Catholic leaders even boast that in this day of burgeoning "goddess consciousness" and "women's liberation" the Catholic Church is right in tune with the times: A woman holds the position of highest honor and power. In Catholicism it is a woman through whom all graces, gifts, blessings, and power flow-a woman, who, as we shall see, has the amazing potential to unite the entire world, including even the Muslims, in one religion. This "perpetual Virgin," however, is a fiction that bears no relationship to the real Mary of the Bible, a woman who was not only Christ's mother but also Joseph's loving wife.

Mary "Ever Virgin"?
The Bible teaches that Mary was a virgin until the time that Jesus was born. Subsequently she had a number of other children by Joseph, her husband. This fact is clearly expressed by the statement that Jesus was her "firstborn son" and that Joseph "knew her not until" Christ was born (Matthew 1:25). There are repeated references to Jesus' brothers and sisters, some of whom are even mentioned by name. The people who knew Jesus where He grew up in Nazareth "were astonished and said, Whence hath this man this wisdom and these mighty
works?" They went on to argue:
Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And his brethren James and Joses and Simon and Judas? And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things? (Matthew 13:55,56; cf. Mark 6:3).
Catholic apologists such as Karl Keating insist that these brothers and sisters were really Christ's cousins and that Matthew and Mark had to use the word for brother/sister because neither Hebrew nor Aramaic had a word for "cousin." There is no basis for such an unbiblical supposition. Furthermore, Matthew and Mark were written in Greek. Keating insists that although there was a word for cousins (anepsios) in the Greek, it was common for Jews writing in Greek to continue the Hebrew practice of referring to all relatives as brothers/sisters (adelphos). He cites examples from the Septuagint, but none from the New Testament, because there are none. In fact, anepsios is used in Colossians 4:10 to refer to the cousin of Barnabas. Moreover, the brethren of Jesus are usually mentioned as being in the company of Mary, indicating that they were her children in her care or, if grown, traveling with her as part of the immediate family.
The Catholic argument goes on to insist that for Christ to be born of a womb that would later conceive and give birth to other children would somehow contaminate Him. That argument, again, is not only without biblical basis but takes away from Christ's very humility in becoming a man. Peter de Rosa, as a Catholic, gives some interesting insights into why Rome can't allow Mary to have sexual intercourse even after giving birth to Christ:
[W]e noted that priests, especially popes, have developed a cult of the Virgin Mary. For celibates, the ideal woman is an asexual being who gave birth to a child. Mary had a baby without sexual intercourse; that is perfection.
If Mary had taken a vow of virginity, however, and that was what she meant by her response to Gabriel, then (as Martin Luther pointed out) by allowing Joseph to marry her she would have committed treachery and poured contempt upon the holy covenant of marriage. Even the Catholic Church doesn't allow a wife to take a vow of continence at her own pleasure, and the Bible is against it, declaring that the marriage bed is God's will for married couples (Genesis 1:28; 2:21-24; 1 Corinthians 7:3-5) and that it is honorable in all (Hebrews 13:4).
Clearly Mary's words to Gabriel "How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?" (Luke 1:34) refer only to her condition at that time. This was not a declaration that she had taken a vow of celibacy. If she had, she would not have been engaged to Joseph (verse 27). And if her perpetual virginity isn't true, neither are the other fantasies about Mary which Catholicism has invented (her immaculate conception, bodily assumption to heaven, etc.).




Mary, "Mother of God"?
The most authoritative book written on Catholicism's "Virgin Mary" is by Cardinal and Saint Alphonsus de Liguori. Titled The Glories of Mary, it is a virtual compendium of what the great "saints" of the Roman Catholic Church have had to say about Mary down through the centuries. The chapter headings are staggering, crediting Mary with attributes, abilities, titles, and functions that belong to Christ alone: "Mary, Our Life, Our Sweetness"; "Mary, Our Hope"; "Mary, Our Help"; "Mary, Our Advocate"; "Mary, Our Guardian"; "Mary, Our Salvation." Here is a sampling of Liguori's quotes of what the saints have said concerning Mary's role in salvation:
Sinners receive pardon by ... Mary alone. He falls and is lost who has not recourse to Mary. Mary is called ...the gate of Heaven because no one can enter that blessed kingdom without passing through her. The way of salvation is open to none otherwise than through Mary ... the salvation of all depends on their being favored and protected by Mary. He who is protected by Mary will be saved; he who is not will be lost ... our salvation depends on thee.... God will not save us without the intercession of Mary.... who would receive any grace were it not for thee, 0h Mother of God ... ?
(Fountain: A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST, Chap.22, By Dave Hunt)




ACQUAINTANCE´S PILLS
-I-
By:J.N.Robles Olarte

A fundamental theology of the Old Testament is the fact that Eternal Creator (YHWH) is not dealing with the whole world! That is because His truths were revealed only to the children of Israel and would be through this people that salvation would comes a reality to the rest of nations. And it is ridiculous think that Eternal would go against His word, robs the Israelites, give everything over the gentiles, when He says that He does not change.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Israelite Ha-Mashiah was never supposed to die for the sins of Israel. Psalms 22 and Isaiah 53 have been misused for that purpose!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Eternal Creator, as the creator of all, does not dwell in the created!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Holy Scriptures or Tanakh has been disdainfully dubbed like the “Old” Testament and it has been replaced with a false one called “New” Testament or Covenant. That “new” covenant is with death!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Tribe of Judah, or Jews, are the one people who have kept intact the word of Eternal Creator.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The false apostle Paul was the ideologist and architect of the most amazing hybrid religion of Hellenism and Judaism we know today as Christianity!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The only divinity taught in the Holy Scriptures of Israel is YHWH or the Elohim of Abraham!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Eternal Creator implores the children of Israel, His children, to return to Him, not to some man who has supplanted the Elohim of Israel.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Elohim of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is not a man, but the Creator of all the cosmos of our universe!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
We never must forget the divine declaration: “Then all that honour Me, I will honour, and they that despise Me shall be lightly esteemed”
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
When Christianity was coming “into its own”, was in a world dominated by pagans Platonic thoughts!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The “Holy Spirit” is not a divine person but a power proceeding from Eternal Creator which gives life , bestows strength, illuminates and impels us towards the good!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
The plurality within a UNIQUE Creator is not healthy!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
One of the “Church´s Fathers” who first used the term TRINITY was the so called Tertullian. Was, then when the men, in the East, began to speak of the TRIAPOSOPA or THREE PERSONS
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Hebrew Scriptures and not FAITH is the truth because the wisdom of men is not reliable or certain at all!
In the marriage between Christianity and Paganism, the former gave up its character and the later its name!
Phillip Schaff
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Was a curious Babylonian habit of giving numbers as well as names to their gods, or rather identifying certain numbers with certain divinities.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Between us, the humand kind, there is not the umpolluted good or the absolute evils!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
The Catholic priest and writer, Dr.John Sullivan, sums up the modern day minister´s total ignorance of the origins of their religion and comments that “it is curious that between the heathen the cross tipify earthly life, and among the Christian denotes spiritual and eternal life.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
The enmendations in the Holy Scriptures made by the sopherim or scribes were carried out believing the name YHWH should not be used in certain contexts but they kept meticulous records of those changes or alterations of the text with the honest, but wrong, purpose that future generations would know where they had made those changes, that in total are 26!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The cross was the symbol of worship of the highest antiquity in Egypt and Syria. The rites they used with the cross ressemble those of communion and baptism and were practiced by pagan nations. In reality the cross was the signal that Eternal put in Cain when he kills his brother Abel.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Crucifixion is credited by many histories as having been devised in Babylon and Assyria and credited its inventions as a form of execution by Semiramis.




ACQUAINTANCE´S PILLS
II

By: J.N.Robles Olarte

The Greek word STAURUS simply meant a stake. The historian Lipoius named it like “a simple upright stake”. Was rendered by the Catholic translator Jerome into the Latin word CRUX in his Latin Vulgate. Jerome was perpetuating the tradition of his church which had accepted the gods of their pagan converts.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
Homer used, in his Greek classic, the word STAURUS of and ordinary pole, or a single piece of timber.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The death of Nimrod by hand of his mother-wife-sister occurred on a cross 2000 years before the supposed dead of Jesus Christ. That was the reason why the first century church did not, as Eternal Creator forbids, make any image, or venerate any object as sacred. That customs was in use among “Christian” only and until the 4th or 5th centuries.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
When the cross, or phallus, were erected in the earth they represented the sexual organs of both male and female duties where the oval circle was the female organ within the cross section of the TAU or Celtic Cross like it´s known!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The supposed death and sacrifice of the Christian Jesus who, symbolically, scattered his body among his believers in the Passover command “take and eat, this is my body” it is not but a remembrance of the historical dead of Nimrod and the scattering of his dismembered body as a sacrifice for the “sins of the world”.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
“The pagan Aztecs, before the coming of the Spaniards, had a communion composed of corn flour and blood, which they ate in sorrow for the sacrifice of their “savior god” who died on the cross too”.
“History of the Conquest of Mexico” by W.H Prescott
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
What we can see now in the Christianity is the “perfect” syncretism of the pagan custom where ISIS, or Mary, is finally reigning as supreme as the mother-goddes of Rome and HORUS the son of MITHRA known, between the Druids of Ireland, like HESUS, or the “savior” son, or the Jesus we have known within Christianity.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The medieval conception of the Jews as devil is, today, a myth that still exist in transmuted form between many peoples in all Europe. But that thinking is not but the by product AB INITIO of the plot of Lucifer, or Satan, to cloud its more inner purpose to displace the choosed Hebrew people and replace them with itself like the new elected of Eternal, masquerading after the title of Christianity. The anti-Jewish prejudice is older and more extensive than Christianity and date since the same creation because Lucifer or Satan know perfectly its fate and Eternal´s Plan for the mankind though his choosed people: the Hebrews!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The study between the Jews was considered, in ancient times, to be one of the highest forms of worship and was pursued both day and night as well as on the Sabbaths and Holydays.
Dr. Ron Manley
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Looking at the New Testament, “they are narratives in which legend is rationalized and posses for authentic history, in which history is made the pendant of legend, or viceversa “
Joshua Trachttenberg.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
“The truth always is strange, more strange than the same fiction.”
Lord Byron
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Nekamah Bealim Adonai ¡
Que caiga la justicia del Creador!
Coming on us the Eternal´s justice!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Those who sacrifices their children or another man act for an inveterate custom as often as powerful like the nature itself!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The natural instinct of the carnal mind is to want to put one´s self above other people. This is the attitude from where the world´s form of self esteem comes . It is a false form of self respect.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The majority of the Jews, who were, historically, quite “orthodox” would never have sucumbe¡to0 the pagan superstitions of Christianity in light of their own knowledge of the “Faith of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob”
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Characteristics of Pagan gods:
ATTYS =Saviour or the Only Begotten Son
OSIRIS & TAMMUZ =the Good Shepherd
SORAPIS = Lord of Death & King of Glory
MITHRA & HERACLES = the sun of Righteousness
HELIOS, = Rising Sun
DIONYSUS =King of Kings
HERMES =Logos, Enlightened One
VISSNU & MITRA = Son of Man, Messiah
ADONIS = Lord & Bridegroom
MOT- ALEYIN = the Lamb of God
BUDDHA = Great Physician
SERAPIS = the Healer of the world
ZORASTER =the Healer of the world
BACHIO = the Healer of the world
HORUS = the Healer of the world
MARDUK =Logos, Creator of heaven and Earth, the Merciful One, Life Giver
BACHUS = Christos, Sun God of Wine
AESCULAPIUS = The Healer
KHRISNA = Saviour God
POSEIDON = God of the Sea who walk across the surface of the water.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Simply make no sense that Jesus performed “signs” at the sight of only a handful of men when the real Mashiach, choosed by Eternal, will come to all twelve Tribes of Israel.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Where, in Old Testament books, can we find a prophecy that tell and teach us we must eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Mashiach?
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Really, the sacrifice of the Passover Lamb, which is equated with Jews, was not and is not a sin offering. The Passover itself was instituted by our Eternal Creator – YHWH or Elohim – forever and no man has the right to abrogate it and institute another command: the abominable substitution of drinking blood and eat human flesh.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The truth of Prophecy was and is that that the Mashiach will come only to the Israelites -Jews included- and not to the gentiles!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
INEXACTITUDES IN THE “NEW TESTAMENT”
Mathew 23:35 = Zachariah is called there “son of Barachiah”
2 Chronicle 24:20-21 =Zachariah is son of Jehoidah
Mark 2:25-26 = David ate the slowbread when Abiatar was High Priest
1 Samuel 21:2 = The High Priest was Ahimelech really
1 Samuel 22:18 = Abiathar is son of Ahimelech
Luke 2:4-5 = Bethlehem, the city of David
2 Samuel 5:6-7 = Jerusalem, Zion City or City of David, really
Acts 7:14 = speak about 75 souls
Genesis 46:27 = speak about 70 only
1 Corinthians 10:8 = speak about 23000 souls
Numbers 25:9 = speak about 240000 souls
Galatians 3:16 = speak about “Thy seed”
Genesis 13:16 = speak about “your offspring as the dust” (see, too, Genesis 15:13, 26:4 and 22:17)
Hebrew 9:19-20 = Moses sprinkled both the people and the book of Covenant.
Exodus 24:6-8 = Moses sprinkled, ONLY, the people
Hebrew 11:21 = we find here Joseph leaning upon the head of his staff
Genesis 47:31 = Joseph bowed himself upon the head of his bed
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Blind faith is a disastrous state for any human being to be in!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The truth of Eternal Creator was revealed only to the children of Israel, and it would be through these people that salvation would come to the rest of the world!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Eternal Creator is not mocked !
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
When one goes to the source of the Old Testament, the Holy Scriptures really, and read what is written there, without bids, the claims of Christianity, the plain truth will not coincide. Why? Because the named N.T. has been forged by false fathers of the early church who were not Hebrews but pagans!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Holy Scriptures of Israel will provide us the undeniable evidence of the dishonesty of the early church fathers. These writings has been preserved specifically for the Twelve Tribes of Israel in this end times, and will reveal the words of Elohim.





ACQUINTANCE´S PILLS
-III-
By:J.N.Robles Olarte

The Christian editions reverse the real order of the prophet writings, so that the word´s blessing of Malachi 4:5-6 (in Hebrew 3:23-24), concerning Elijah, become transitional to the N.T. and connect it with the role of John the Baptist
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The reason that the true prophecies of Israel´s Mashiach are not used in reference to Jesus is that the N.T. was never written about the Mashiach of Israel, the real one. It was written about the “God Saviour” of the Babylonian.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The writers of the N.T. ,inspired by Satan, had to look for excuses in out-of-context verses to may deceive the latter day Tribes of Israel in their continued baal worshiping !
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Jesus´s life and their stories are meaningless if there is no advent of the Ha-Mashiach of Israel, like in reality must and will be.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
One thing is for real: there is but one Creator of the universes of the cosmos!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Mashiach of Israel –Israel&Juda- was and is, by no means, one and the same as the Creato.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The end-time Houses of Israel and Judah are separate UNTIL the coming of the Ha-Mashiach.This one is a point that most Christian ministers and lay men are totally ignorant of. In fact, they do not want understand it because necessarily opens the door to the truth they do not want accept: that the real Ha-Mashiach is the Ha-Mashiach of Israel! That is the reason they insist that the reunification of Israel with Judah took place in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. This will be a reality in the prophetic “Last Days”
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
When those days come and the Mashiach being a reality, then Israel and Judah shall be one nation and restored to their inheritance!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Holy Scriptures of Israel and for Israel , says us that He is One and not a plural divinity!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Christian Gnostic Church was indeed the true Christian Church where many of their “fathers” wrote the early “gospels”, teaching a different story inspired by Lucifer!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Holy One of Israel brings His people the sure writings we can have for sure and that they are the genuine one: the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings! That is the reason that we can read in 2 Kings 5:15 these words: “Now I know that there is no Eternal Creator in the whole world except in Israel”!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The most important thing for us is the revealed Word of Eternal ¡ So we must read them with our mind rather than merely with our eyes!

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Hindus, like the Christians, speak of “tolerance” and “non violence” but they violate those teachings. The factor that triggers the violence is the rejection. It is a centripetal force because attracts and gathers many separate parts into one whole. Eternal is the ONE Creator Who insist on remain separate, on being exclusive, the Only One Creator, One Who refuses to become a plural divinity!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The writings of Paul do not dwell on the Law and the less in the Holy Scriptures! They all are false and spurious: the handy work of a man!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
By following the Judaism, we miss the true Passover and the protection that occurred at the midnight of the 14th day of Nissan.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
We must keep our eyes on the simplicity of Eternal´s Word!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Most High Sovereign, the Mighty One and Powerful One is ONLY the Eternal Creator: YHWH!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The Phalic representation of the steeples and the Crosses are by no means signs that comes from paganism.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
One of the principles we can learn of the Holy Scriptures is that our Creator, unlike the pagan deities, does not lives in wood or stone. This mean that as Creator does not dwell in the created and less in a human being. Remember 1 Kings 8:27
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
Some ,not to say all, churches and their ministers teach an amount of truths but, a little truth mixed with errors -damnable errors- still spells disasters.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
In numerous prophecies of the Old Testament Eternal warns us that we have left the conviction (faith) of our fathers. He exhorts us return to Him, to His word, through the books of the His prophets.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
In the END TIME, Eternal will lays a foundation in Jerusalem that shall smite the lies of Baalism and that foundation shall nullify the agreement Israel has made with death and grave. That “foundation” shall be the true faith or conviction in our fathers: Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The gentiles and pagans must adquire their salvation through the restored twelve Tribes of Israel, directly from the Creator of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The “reason” and the “why” Eternal has forgotten His people we can found it in Isaiah 43:21!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
There is no god before Israel´s Creator: Isaiah 43:10, 11, 14, 15, 21 & 25
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
We should understand that the Saviour of Israel -the same Saviour of all the human kind- the ONE who forgives their sins, will not “lose” the 10 Tribes of Israel! They are not gone! They are alive in these instants! Eternal knows where they are and He is going to restore them as His word says…….in the LAST DAYS!
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o



Reflexiones sobre Janucá
Por el Rabino Marc D. Ángel
El Shabat de Janucá se observó entre los sefardíes del Imperio Otomano como “Shabat Halbashah”, Shabat de proporcionar la ropa para los necesitados. Tradicionalmente, el rabino daria un sermón aquel día resaltando la Mitzvá de la caridad y la misericordia. A partir del día siguiente, los miembros de la comunidad llevaban ropa a la sinagoga, que luego se distribuiría entre los pobres en Rosh Jodesh Tebet, el sexto día de Janucá.
Un motivo para esta costumbre es que Janucá pasa justo cuando se acerca el invierno (en el hemisferio norte). Es importante que la comunidad proporcione ropa adecuada para los miembros no las tienen para poder pasar la temporada fría. Por otra parte, el Janucá conmemora la unidad que prevaleció entre los Judíos de la antigüedad que lucharon contra los opresores sirio-griegos, y que re-dedicó el templo de Jerusalén. Así como nuestros antepasados reconocieron su responsabilidad el uno al otro y a D-s, por eso cada Judio de cada generación debe reconoce nuestro compromiso con los demás y con D-s.
Un proverbio judeo-español dice: “El harto no cree al hambriento”. Cuando uno vive en relativa prosperidad, no siempre es fácil sentir empatía por aquellos que carecen de necesidades básicas. La gente se vuelve fría. Dicen:
He trabajado por lo que tengo, dejemos a los demás trabajar por lo que falta. ¿Por qué debería dar mi dinero duramente ganado para ayudar a otros? El que piensa así no puede sentir la verdadera sensación de hambre de los pobres, y no podría responder rápidamente o con compasión suficiente.
En su relato, “Grosellas”, Anton Chekhov dice: “Debería haber, detrás de la puerta de cada hombre feliz y contento, alguien con un martillo que le recordara continuamente, como un grifo, que hay gente infeliz, que sin embargo es feliz; la vida le mostrará sus vueltas, que, tarde o temprano, los problemas vendrán sobre él, la enfermedad, la pobreza, las pérdidas, y nadie va a ver o escuchar, al igual que ahora no ve ni oye a otros; pero no existe ningún hombre con un martillo. ....”
El Shabat Halbashah sirve como un “martillo”, como recordatorio de que todos somos responsables unos de otros, que tenemos que cuidar de los demás del mismo modo que ellos tendrán que proveer para nosotros si pasamos algún peligro.
La lección sin duda se aplica a proporcionar apoyo material a los necesitados. Pero creo que también se puede extender en lo espiritual, intelectual, vida cultural y colectiva. La comunidad judía patrocina una serie de instituciones dedicadas a fomentar el estilo de vida judía - sinagogas, escuelas, organizaciones culturales, centros comunales, etc. Estas instituciones tratan de cuidar de nuestra vida espiritual, y de dar servicios para todos nosotros. Así como debemos ser sensibles a las necesidades físicas de los pobres, tenemos que ser sensibles a las necesidades espirituales de toda nuestra comunidad. Es tan fácil decir: deja que otros den apoyo a estas instituciones, que los demás paguen por estos servicios, deja que otros asuman la responsabilidad de dar vida a la comunidad judía.
El Shabat Halbashah sirve como un “martillo”, golpeando suavemente la pared, nos recuerda que debemos ser mas empáticos, participar más, en compartir mas con la comunidad. Hay tantos desafíos que enfrenta nuestra comunidad judía: cada uno de nosotros tenemos que desempeñar un papel activo en el fortalecimiento y la mejora de nuestros objetivos.
Cuando celebremos el Janucá, recordemos en proporcionar sustento físico a las personas necesitadas, y para proporcionar sustento para las necesidades espirituales de nuestra comunidad entera - ya que todos necesitamos y nos beneficiamos de ellas, instituciones que fomentar la vida judía en su mejor forma.